Skip to content


Realities of academia: On the two-body problem, emotional states and research/career advancement

Earlier this week, I tweeted something that I think is often forgotten: we academics are humans who do research, not robots. Thus, our careers’ advancement and research progress are often hindered by our emotional states.

I mention the negative impact of emotions rather than the positive, although it is true that emotional well-being has a positive impact on research. In my case, being close now to my parents (who live in Mexico) has in fact improved my ability to focus on my research. When I lived abroad, I was often worried about their well-being and now that I live in Mexico too, it is much easier for me to focus and be less preoccupied.

The reality of academic life is that very often, personal relationships will suffer (read this post by the spouse of an academic for but one example) For privacy reasons, I will not to delve into my own personal situation, but let’s just say that I played the “let’s try to solve the two-body problem” game, and I lost (as recently as two weeks ago). Very few people know the inner details of what happened, but I will just indicate that this is the second time I have tried to solve the two-body problem, and the second time I failed. One was as a young, promising PhD candidate, and the second one, as an early-career scholar.

No amount of advice prepares you for this moment. But at least *some* universities have taken to publicly acknowledge the challenges of dual careers and provide *some* advice (read here and here). And at least, there has been *some* discussion (read a Storify here) online.

In my case, the distance is huge (from Canada to Mexico), and the financial challenges are pretty big (no matter how often you want to fly back-and-forth, it gets incredibly expensive and relationships take a big emotional toll). That’s the part that I think is often left outside of *any* discussion on academic life. The reality is, we (and by we I mean, PhD students, early career scholars, and even senior professors) very well could be heartbroken (due to relationship breakups, family or friends’ deaths or illnesses), and yet we seem to be expected to “just tough it out” and survive (and continue thriving in academia, publishing, teaching and doing research). Little is being written about how to deal with emotions in academic life, even as we often face emotional fatigue.

The truth is, everyone around me has been amazingly supportive during this difficult time, particularly my fellow professors at CIDE, and of course my friends and family. Even my own students have reached out to lend an ear. Having a strong network of support is key to success in any kind of life, and academia requires a very robust team of people who will want to help. My former PhD advisor was fantastic in this regard, not only with me but with every single one of his PhD students, and I hope my own students know that they can always reach out to me if they are in emotional pain that could potentially hinder their research progress.

I can’t speak for anybody else, but I have always taken into account my students’ (and colleagues’) emotional state when discussing research. My co-authors and co-principal-investigators have been amazing and asked if I would like to take some time off or offer to take the lead in a project. The truth is, life goes on, and mine will go on as well. I have a thriving research agenda and am looking forward to a bright future. But I am also human and I know that there might be times when I’ll feel awful, and sad. And the great thing is – I know I will have folks to count on when this happens. Folks who want me to succeed in academia and in life. And that’s a great relief.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with .


On the evolution of my thinking and research trajectory

A month or so ago, I began writing a document that mapped my writing output and my research trajectory. More than the research trajectory that other writers and myself have referred to at some points (i.e., the roadmap of what research output you need by when in order to achieve tenure, a-la-Karen Kelsky), the document I’m writing maps what I have written and researched in the past 5 years (2008-2013). It’s kind of an REF report and a research trajectory altogether. The report is a narrative account of my scholarly output and my research plans towards the future.

Lynn Canyon

This document (my research trajectory and output file) is important to me because it gives me (and anybody who is interested in finding out more about what I do, including university administrators, fellow academics and potential graduate students) a clear map of how my thinking has evolved throughout the years. How I began some projects and how I’m closing others out.

Parque El Cedazo (Aguascalientes)

I can clearly tell you that I just recently realized in 2013 how I came about starting to study water conflicts. In 1998 (a decade ago), I began trying to understand how strategic alliances between large pharmaceutical companies and small biotechnology firms could be designed so that the small biotech businesses did not suffer from moral hazard conditions. I found that they cooperated through repeated games of information sharing in an information-asymmetric environment. For this project, I created a game-theoretic model that explained the entire process. It was fascinating. More than 15 years ago I fell in love with the idea of cooperation between actors, and that is one that to this day, still drives and fuels my research interests. Why do agents cooperate and under which conditions?

In 2004, I began (on a side project) studying cooperation for wastewater governance through river basin councils, almost a decade ago. Given that I had been a specialist in cooperation within industrial districts (and that was what I was doing for my PhD dissertation work), studying cooperation in water management seemed to be naturally dovetailing my work. Given that I was interested in understanding how firms within an industrial district cooperated for survival, analyzing how individuals cooperated to manage the wastewater generated within their region seemed like a plausible detour from my original scholarly trajectory. While I wasn’t bent on any particular theory, I quickly discovered Ostrom, North and Williamson’s institutional theories fit well with my interest in collaboration for water management.

Two years ago (2011), I narrowed down the analytical core of my research agenda: I’m someone who uses questions of how can agents cooperate for appropriate resource management under complex governance conditions. I am interested in intractable, wicked problems. It was important for me to see this.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Last year (2012), as I was asked to write a book chapter on water conflict, I realized that I knew very little about the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and conflict resolution literatures. I also knew very little about water conflict. Much of the literature (the vast majority, in fact) I had read dealt with resource self-governance processes (a la Ostrom and collaborators). Very little had I read about “conflict transformation” and “conflict framing” (a la Barbara Gray).

Strangely enough, when I did my PhD, I took courses on multistakeholder, participatory processes for water governance (with UBC Professor Tony Dorcey). I did know about this literature, but my keen interest in cooperation quickly made me forget about it. I had read Barbara Gray, Judith Innes, Fisher and Ury and a number of planning theorists on how to get collaboration (”getting to yes”) in resource planning contexts, but in the past decade, I forgot about them. I’m just now getting back into this literature.

I am really excited for my next 5 years (2013-2018) research trajectory. I’m excited about learning more about water conflicts (and working on water conflict in Mexico at the sub-national scale). I’m fascinated by the chasm between water cooperation and water conflict bodies of work. And I’m delighted to be delving more into the solid waste governance field (one that I always wanted to explore more, but I didn’t explore in enough detail).

Posted in academia, research, water governance.

Tagged with , , .


Happy Teachers and Professors Day (May 15th) – Feliz Dia del Maestro!

Raul speaking at Social Media Camp Victoria 2011 Awards (Photo by Shelley Lipke Photography)

Photo credit: Shelley Lipke Photography on Flickr

May 15th is the day when we celebrate teachers, educators and professors in Mexico (Dia del Maestro, in Spanish). I love teaching. Actually, I feel that I was born to teach. In fact, I was born to two educators (my Mom is a professor of government and political science at the Universidad de Guanajuato, and my Dad is a lawyer who taught law for decades). My brothers (all of the four of them) have all taught high school or post-secondary in one way or another. One of them, my oldest brother (Arturo) did his PhD at the University of Notre Dame, and is now a tenured Associate Professor at California State University Los Angeles. Rafael got his PhD from, and then taught at Arizona State University. We all did our graduate degrees abroad, and even though only my Mom, Arturo and I officially remain in the higher education field, we all have taught at some point in our lives.

There are few things that give me more pleasure in life than receiving emails from former students of mine, asking for a letter of reference for graduate school or for a job, or simply asking for advice or help to navigate a complex job landscape. I can’t say that all my student reviews have always been glowing, but I have always been extremely dedicated to my students, and I love being able to shape their lives and help them grow. I recently blogged about this aspect, in fact.

Social Media Club, Victoria

Photo credit: Paul Holmes on Flickr

This is my teaching philosophy, extracted from my teaching dossier:

As a teacher, my philosophy is that learning should be constructive, challenging, fun and exciting. Constructive in that my role is to help the student feel confident about his/her skills for the future. Challenging, insofar it should present difficulties that both the student and I will have to work together to overcome. Fun, in that it should provide joy for the student and me as the teacher. And exciting in that learning should be an activity to which both student and teacher should be looking forward. The feedback I have received from students is that I am able to provide all of these in a comfortable learning environment.

I loved teaching at UBC’s Department of Political Science, I loved teaching in Mexico and have enjoyed giving lectures abroad, and I would never change my professional activity. And I love being a professor at CIDE now, and look forward to teaching this fall. Ever since I was a child, I have loved sharing whatever knowledge I have. It’s in my blood.

Of course, who doesn’t love when they get glowing reviews? I do, and comments like these keep me coming back for more. I have usually had very heavy teaching loads (2-1-2), but I never have lamented it, because I now have an army of hundreds of former students who, I believe, will change Canadian society (I have taught most of my post-PhD time in Canada, even though now I’m based in Mexico) and the world (I also have had hundreds of foreign students).

“I found Dr. Pacheco-Vega to be not only a very effective teacher but a considerate and fair individual. He made a point of including students who may have been to shy to enter discussions in class with individual discussions, asking leading questions and using blogs. He showed concern for his students learning and their well-being. I would recommend Dr. Pacheco-Vega as one of the best instructors I have had in my years at this university.”

“Raul Pacheco-Vega is indeed contributing on the paradigm shift level with his teaching. What an amazing professor/scholar/person (perhaps not constructive in an evaluation-sense, but must be said -not being perceived as strategically flatter)”

“Professor Pacheco-Vega was a rare treat to have this term and I’m glad that on my one visiting semester I had the privilege of being in one of his classes. The quality of instruction was excellent and he had the right amount of interesting guests come and speak to the class.”

“One of the best courses I have taken in my undergraduate career simply because of the class atmosphere. Dr. Pacheco-Vega acts as a mentor to his students and his classroom really is a place that is comfortable for students to share their opinions and mull out ideas they’re not sure of yet. This class was very diffuse of the normal teacher-student power relationship… rather, this class was one where all students were combining their knowledge, opinions and experience to really hash out what we were learning about.”

Raul Pachego Vega  - Northern Voice 2011

Photo credit: Kris Krug on Flickr

To my former teachers and professors, especially those who shaped my thinking (my PhD advisor, my committee members, the professors I was a research assistant of, and those I’ve coauthored papers with): you instilled passion and commitment in my research and shaped my teaching and for that, I am incredibly grateful.

To my former students: you all make me proud every day, and you remind me day after day that I made the right decision to become a professor. Your infectious energy, your intelligence, your passion to seek social change has made my teaching career incredibly rich, and I’m proud and honored to have taught you.

To my current and former colleagues: I’m humbled and thrilled to be part of the academic community at large, and of having shared scholarly pursuits with you all. You are part of what will drive change in this world, and I’m honored to be part of the academic community we belong to.

I love the collegiality of being a professor (here is a photo of me with my dear friend Professor Janni Aragon of the University of Victoria).

Social Media Camp Victoria 2011 (Amber Naslund and my talk with Janni Aragon"

So, to all of you my fellow educators, Happy Teachers, Educators and Professors Day! Feliz Dia del Maestro!

Posted in academia, teaching.

Tagged with .


Towards interdisciplinarity: Recent book acquisitions by CIDE Region Centro’s library

One of the reasons that attracted me to CIDE Region Centro, and to take a professor position here, was the premise (and the promise) of a hub for interdisciplinary scholarship on regional studies. CIDE Region Centro has two main research programmes, the Programme on Drug Policy and the Programme on Regional Studies. I work mostly on the second one, although given how much environmental work we do, we might at some point open a Program in Environmental Studies. That still is yet to be seen, but I’m quite hopeful. I was trained in an environment that encouraged cross-fertilization and learning from other bodies of literature. My PhD itself is interdisciplinary, and my doctoral dissertation’s theoretical and analytical frameworks borrowed from chemical engineering, environmental politics, comparative public policy, anthropology and sociology, and economic geography.

I recently became CIDE Region Centro’s representative to the Library Acquisitions Committee of CIDE (the entire university), so I am now in charge of coordinating all library resources’ requests by faculty, staff and students. Two key tenets drive my approach to this new task. First, I want CIDE Region Centro’s library to be the best academic library in the central region of Mexico. Second, I want CIDE Region Centro’s book collection to showcase the interdisciplinary nature of our scholarly work. I think so far we’ve been doing great. Below you will find photographs of some of the most recent acquisitions we’ve brought to the library.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Yeah, our students won’t only do quantitative stuff, but they will also learn about ethnographic methods.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

And of course, it’s clear that I have an interest in having environmental politics books at CIDE Region Centro. Some of these are specific to my own field of research.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Slowly but surely, we are building the book collection at CIDE Region Centro (remember, the campus is only 2 years old!)

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

And of course, we have LOTS of books on water governance and water politics.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Posted in academia, research, research methods.

Tagged with , , , .


On working from home as an academic: Having the best possible setup for a home office

Given that I’ve been focusing this year on being disciplined and writing EVERY SINGLE DAY (something I had to stop doing for 2 weeks while JT was here visiting me from Vancouver), and that I write first thing in the morning (4:45am, for the most part, although when I sleep in I start working at 6:00am and writing, even on weekends), I knew that I needed to have the best possible setup as a home office. Having a well-designed home office increases my productivity and encourages me to write.

My home office in Aguascalientes

I have spent a small fortune in having my home office desk, bookshelves and accessories made-to-fit, but I figured I had to design an actuall, full-blown office at home. My house is 3 bedrooms, 2 stories and thus I knew that I would be assigning one of the bedrooms to my home office. I have set up high-speed wireless internet connection at home, and an all-in-one printer (which you can’t picture right now because I just bought it).

My home office in Aguascalientes

I also added a corkboard and a whiteboard, so that I could follow up with whatever writing or research commitments I have. In my home office, in a similar fashion but not quite like my office at CIDE, I have framed drawings that my nieces and nephews have created for me throughout the years, for motivation.

Overall, I’m quite proud of my home office. I recognize this kind of set up is unique as I am a single guy who lives in a 3 bedroom house and thus I have tonnes of space to arrange my life around, but I figured it might be of interest to anyone who reads my research blog.

My home office in Aguascalientes

Also, when I talked about discipline in writing earlier on my blog, I mentioned that I don’t leave my home office (nor my house) until I have written at least 30 minutes, and even better if I have managed to write for 2 hours (normally from 4:45am to 6:45am). I can then head to the university by 8:00am. My rule is never leave the house (and my home office) without having at least written for 30 minutes.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


National Teacher Appreciation Day 2013

Dr. Raul Pacheco-Vega giving a seminar/ teachingWhenever I think of my past and how it influenced my career choice of being a professor now, I always come back to my childhood. When I was 11, I read somewhere that the literacy rate in Mexico was in the 90%, but I never really believed it (obviously, these rates may vary geographically and at sub-national scales it may be much lower). I always wanted everyone to have a chance at a better life, and because both my parents were academics, teachers and professors, and in time, my older brothers also became teachers and professors, I figured the best way to help people was from the start: teaching them how to read and write. Literacy programs have always been near and dear to my heart.

So, at 11 years old, one good day I stopped by the National Institute for Adult Education (INEA) offices in my parents’ hometown and asked if I could join their literacy programs. I chose a gang-riddled area, not because I thought I was tough, but because I figured urban areas with gangs probably were the ones where the most illiterate people would be (what naivete in a young kid!) and that’s where I wanted to have the most impact.

I conducted literacy programs from when I was 11 to when I turned 16 years old and I still would love to continue doing it. I also tutored kids in math, science and writing. I figured that I had the teaching gene (my late Aunt also was a teacher) in my bloodstream, so I might as well continue on. And since I was 11 and to this day (even with a full year of teaching release), I’ve continued to teach. I am a born teacher. I was born to help people learn and realize their goals.

I’ve always been honored and humbled when my current and former students praise my approach to teaching, not because I’m self-absorbed, but because I absolutely, completely and entirely love teaching. Even when I’ve had teaching loads of 2-1-2, I’ve always loved doing it because I always get to see and hear from my former students and I am a witness to their growth and success. I’m passionate about teaching because as I have told my students, there is method to my madness: I can’t change the world as I am but one person. But I can imprint their minds and their hearts with a passion for improving the world around them, and THAT will enable me to change the world: creating hopeful, hard-working and brilliant men and women who will in turn, contribute their little grain of sand to the construction of a better society.

In Mexico we celebrate Teacher’s Day on May 15th, and worldwide World Teachers’ Day is October 5th. But today is National Teacher Appreciation Day and I salute my fellow educators. Happy National Teacher Appreciation Day! Hat tips to my dear friend Lisa Thomas-Tench who alerted me to this momentous occasion.

Posted in academia, teaching.

Tagged with .


A professor who sets the standard for social media (via The Ubyssey)

I was looking for media articles to update my Media page and I found this lovely snippet in the Last Words of February 13th, 2012 on The Ubyssey (The University of British Columbia’s campus-wide official student newspaper) on my approach to social media. I have to say that the best compliment I could ever hear is that my approach to teaching and engaging with my students is innovative. I love teaching, I always have and I always will, and my UBC students have a very, very special place in my heart. The excerpt below can be found here too.

A professor who sets the standard for social media

Although the communications staff in UBC’s various departments often use Twitter and Facebook to get their messages out, only a handful of its faculty really “get” social media.

That’s why it’s refreshing to see a professor who really engages with his students online in a way that isn’t superficial. And in that regard, Raul Pacheco-Vega—the subject of this week’s “Our Campus” profile—is at the head of the pack.

With over two thousand users following his research account and several thousand more on his personal feed, Pacheco-Vega is a minor celebrity by Twitter standards—and a large portion of those followers are his students. He uses the platform to post updates on his research, link to work opportunities in his field and give students real-time feedback on assignments. Through this unfettered interaction with students, Pacheco-Vega makes his work feel vibrant and alive, and it gives the political science department a sense of openness and innovation. Other professors should take note.

I’m truly honored, I really am.

Posted in academia, social media for teaching, teaching.

Tagged with , .


Notes from the field: Studying my own municipality’s solid waste and wastewater systems

I’ve been studying wastewater in Mexico for the better part of the last 20 years of my life. I have designed and built bench-scale effluent biological secondary and tertiary treatment systems and I have undertaken institutional ethnographic analyses of river basin organizations. I also have compared structures for sanitation governance across five states within the same river basin in central Mexico. In the past 5 years, I have branched out again to exploring the politics of solid waste and hazardous/toxic waste policy again.

MX074S11 World Bank

Mexican landfill. Photo credit: © Curt Carnemark / World Bank. Used with permission as per CC-license

Strangely enough, it’s only been until 2012 when I moved to Aguascalientes and started trying to understand its solid waste and wastewater governance systems that I paused to think about the implications of analyzing and studying my own municipality/region. Aguascalientes wasn’t my city (Vancouver, Canada was), but it is now. Beyond the fact that I am Mexican and that I had been based in a foreign country for the better part of the last 15 years studying Mexican environmental policy, I rarely gave it any thought. One of said foreign countries (I lived in Spain, England, France and the US too) soon became my own (Canada), and I also undertook comparative studies at the national and sub-national levels. And I’ve done comparative public policy for the better part of the past 15 years. But very rarely did I think about whether I was studying “my own backyard”. To me, living in a foreign country (Canada) while doing research on a country I knew very well (Mexico) seemed quite ok. But then again, in my comparative work I did analyze Canadian environmental policy too. The scale was what made me comfortable: I was analyzing entire countries rather than municipalities or provinces.

Doing interdisciplinary work means that often times I need to sit down and reflect on the methodological approach and theoretical stance I am taking in my analysis (as a mixed methods scholar, when I do qualitative research I always think of the importance of reflexivity as a research strategy). I’ve often criticized “parachuting” foreign scholars who argue they know Mexico and Mexican politics better than, say, Mexican scholars. But now I wonder whether I’m doing a bit of “parachuting” myself and how much fieldwork in the city of Aguascalientes (e.g. how extensive, how in-depth) should I undertake before I consider that I am specialized enough and that I understand the city and its political and policy structures well enough.

I read someone’s CV recently where the scholar in question indicated a list of countries where he/she had undertaken fieldwork. The list included more than 30 countries, which for the age of said scholar, made me question how long had his/her fieldwork been. I’ve done fieldwork in the US, Canada, Great Britain, Spain and Mexico, and to this day, the only countries where I feel I’m most comfortable mentioning/doing empirical work are the North American ones (Canada, US, Mexico).

I guess I am just wary of now being judged as a “parachuting” scholar who landed in Aguascalientes and is now studying its wastewater and solid waste management systems rather than an academic who is just beginning fieldwork in this specific region (as I have been fully immersed in the city for less than a year). I’d appreciate feedback from all scholars, but particularly those of you who do fieldwork and who do empirical work (interviews, participant observation, etc.) on the qualitative side of things. I think anthropologists, sociologists and geographers especially may have input to provide.

Posted in academia, research, research methods.

Tagged with , .


My Top 10 academic productivity tips, or how I submitted 5 pieces in 3 weeks

In the past 3 weeks, I have submitted a total of 2 journal manuscripts (two in Spanish, one in English), 1 conference paper (in English), 1 book chapter (in Spanish) and one co-authored grant proposal (in English). In addition, I have about 8 manuscripts at various stages of development (for the most part, almost completed). You may think that this is bragging (or pure insanity, depending on your viewpoint). The reality is that this is about what I expected.

Ostrom research

I have been writing every day for at least 2 hours (although I have calculated that in the past 2 weeks I’ve clocked about 60 hours of writing). The first thing I do when I wake up is make a pot of coffee, make my bed, start my computer and begin writing (you can read my Top 10 Tips for Academic Writing here). But being productive and having done the research and only writing it up is not enough. I needed to start feeling like I was achieving something.

So I began submitting the manuscripts. Not only did I write, but I let them go off my desk. It helps when you have deadlines, be it self-imposed or externally requested. I still have one book chapter (in English) and two journal article manuscripts (one in English, one in Spanish) that I need to polish and send off, on top of two book reviews. But seeing my production on Friday evening, mapping out in a document my output and research trajectory and clearing up my desk made me feel incredibly happy.

So, how did I manage to submit 4 manuscripts and a grant proposal in two different languages in less than a month? There are a number of factors that have increased my productivity manyfold.

1. Writing every day. No day goes by (including Saturdays and Sundays) when I don’t write at least for 2 hours solid, even if it is in 4 chunks of 30 minutes each.

My method of doing scholarly research

2. Full teaching release. I know, I’m lucky that way. I am not teaching 2012-2013 (although that’s going to stop in the fall and I’m probably getting a 1-2 or 2-2 teaching load, which probably will hinder my productivity).

3. A small army of research assistants. I have 6 research assistants in Mexico, each of whom is working with me on a different project. In addition, I have 4 research students in Canada and 1 in the United States, all of whom are co-authoring research papers with me. Thus, I am getting a lot of help. While I work on one manuscript with the dataset that one of my RAs assembles, the rest are working on something different. I have a very strong work ethic with my research assistants (you can read my philosophy of working with RAs here).

4. Working in parallel on several projects at the time. This is something that may sound weird to other academics, but I actually find it intellectually stimulating to work in parallel. Write bits of one piece here, bits of another piece there. Of course, as each piece nears completion (and some are completed faster than others), I focus more on that one so that it leaves my desk (or computer, as it may be).

My research output in the past couple of months

5. Submit, submit, submit. The reality is, we are all our worst critics. Every time I read one of my manuscripts, I think that there is something that needs to be improved. So I have learned, through time, to make sure that I don’t submit shoddy work, but I also try to strike a delicate balance with keeping manuscripts in the back burner. I prefer to get them out, get feedback (rejected, revise-and-resubmit, or if I’m lucky, accepted) than keeping them in my computer’s hard drive. I also keep track of which projects I am working on in my office’s whiteboard, and I check-mark those that I have already submitted. By visually keeping track of where I am at, and what I have accomplished, I can sense my own progress.

My method of doing scholarly research

6. Create the best office environment to work. I have set up a home office both at my parents’ place and at my house in Aguascalientes. I have strong wifi, a printer in each one of them, printer, book/paper holder, corkboard and whiteboard, solid office chairs and a sturdy desk, as well as a small fortune in stationery and office supplies. Because I work first thing in the morning, and sometimes at night, I always ensure I have the best setup for working at home. The same occurs at my office at the university. Every so often I will clear up my desk and rearrange my organizing system so that I can have a clear office and desk. Cluttered workspace, cluttered mind or so they say.

My office desk (clean and spotless after clearing up my to-do list)

7. Be organized and disciplined. This is perhaps the biggest challenge I face. You can see my office when it’s perfectly organized, but every few weeks/a month I reorganize my office space and my list of priorities. Writing is always the top one.

How I write an academic paper

8. Learn to say NO. This was something that made me really proud. I did miss several international conferences I was scheduled to present at (and I had already even written the papers), but others I actually said no to. Two of them were in fact complicating my life so much that I was supposed to be in Los Angeles on a Thursday, Denver on a Friday and Chicago on a Saturday. I also said NO to a conference in Vancouver (Canada) when I would have had to be in Tokyo (Japan). The logistics would have been impossible in both cases.

9. Don’t get discouraged and keep going. This week I also received 2 rejections (one, a journal article that I actually thought was a slam-dunk, and a grant proposal I also thought was a done deal). Instead of pouting, I’ve been focusing on completing other pieces and submitting additional grant proposals. I can’t let small setbacks create big obstacles. I also rewarded myself by giving myself permission to pout and be angry. And then I began working on another grant proposal.

10. Reward yourself after completing pieces. This is a piece of advice I received from my friend Jo VanEvery, who emphasizes that you should acknowledge what you’ve accomplished (Jo also happens to be an academic coach). I reward myself when I complete a piece of writing. Be it having dinner at my house and a glass of wine, or heading downtown Aguascalientes and having the best tamales in the entire world, or visiting my parents at their hometown and going for brunch with them, or having chocolate, I give myself a reward which also works as an incentive to keep writing.

I’m well aware that my productivity tips are (some of them, at least) very specific to my personal circumstances. Not everyone can have a small army of research assistants, or full teaching release. But I think the overall gist of my post can be applied to anyone. If you set aside 2 hours of writing (as my other guru, Tanya Golash-Boza indicates on her blog) every single day, you can accomplish a lot. Heck you can accomplish a lot in 30 minute increments (as Aimee Morrison suggests)!

Hopefully my advice is helpful to fellow academic writers. I actually wrote it for myself, but it doesn’t hurt to share it with the world. This post also helps me reflect on my own habits and behaviour and correct them when they’re not working well.

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , .


Dr. Kathy Baylis on forest conservation policies in Mexico at CIDE Region Centro

As part of the Regional Studies programme at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, last week we had Dr. Kathy Baylis (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) give an invited seminar on forest conservation policies in central Mexico. Kathy and I knew each other from our previous positions (we both were faculty members at The University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, Kathy in the faculty of Land and Food Systems and I in the faculty of Arts, in the Department of Political Science), so it was great to get an opportunity to see each other again and catch up.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

While I’m a fan of spatial econometrics (no secret to anyone who knows me), I think what I enjoyed the most about Kathy’s seminar was her instructional approach to explaining the research she is currently undertaking with colleagues in the US and Mexico. We had a lot of students and research assistants in the audience, and I think they all benefited from Kathy explaining things to a very easy-to-digest level. Kathy and her colleagues’ paper explored a patchwork of conservation policies in the Monarch butterfly habitat in Michoacan. I’m well aware of how this area has been (unfortunately) a forested area that is sometimes mismanaged.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

In the paper she presented Kathy and her colleagues investigated the effect of management, logging bans and protected area regulations. As I argued in her talk, one of the biggest challenges Kathy and her colleagues will encounter will be finding ways to create indicators of good resource governance (something I’ve been working on for the past few years, albeit in the water field).

I was also really proud to showcase how our university campus can handle interactions via videoconferencing , as we had several seminar participants from the main campus of CIDE in Santa Fe (Mexico City). Frankly, the more international seminars we organize, the prouder I feel of being at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes. We have the human capital and the technology to disseminate our scholarship widely, and this does make me proud.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

I look forward to continuing these conversations with Kathy and my fellow CIDE colleagues, as I think that policy evaluation is one of the least researched areas of public policy analysis, and one I have maintained an interest in and worked for many years. Moreover, I really enjoyed how a multidisciplinary perspective provided Kathy with a very different view of what her paper would contribute if she had only presented to a purely-economics audience. I think the benefits of interdisciplinarity speak for themselves.

Posted in academia, policy analysis, policy instruments, research, research methods.

Tagged with , , , .