Skip to content


Celebrating World Teachers Day 2012: On why I teach

Sadly, there is no World Professors Day, but there is World Teachers Day, so I figured I would dust off a couple of blog posts that were published on my personal site, but are definitely worth revisiting. The first one mentions the reasons behind my love of teaching.

Communities That Rock: Creating Kick-Ass Online CommunitiesI began teaching at UBC in 2006, although I took a little break around 2008. When I came back to teach at The University of British Columbia a few years ago (I teach in the department of Political Science, at the undergraduate level), a whole new world re-opened. Not teaching for a little while, I had completely forgotten how fulfilling teaching is for me. I teach not because I *have* to but because I love it.
Continued…

Posted in teaching.


Announcing Early Career Chat #ECRChat for the Western hemisphere Thursdays 11am PST

I have written extensively before about how important mentorship is to me, and about how social media can be used by academics to advance their careers. On top of my (already crazy busy) research agenda, I have taken on the challenge of hosting #ECRChat (Early Career Researcher Chat) on Twitter on Thursdays at 11am Pacific Standard Time for the Western hemisphere. #ECRChat was initiated by Katie Wheat and Hazel Ferguson, and their chat is attended by Australian and UK researchers. Because of the time difference, it is difficult to contribute to those discussions, so I volunteered to host for the Western hemisphere (e.g. the Americas and a few other countries).

RPV Twitter Profile

#ECRchat is a global weekly discussion for the early career researcher community via twitter. The chat is intended mainly for the discussion of post-PhD career issues and we welcome anyone who is interested, who has questions, or who has advice to share. We hope that PhD students, postdocs, and junior faculty will all benefit from the advice and resources collected here. We would also love to hear advice and questions from those who have left (or are considering leaving) academia, and from senior faculty, including those who advise PhD students and other ECRs.

Normally, #ECRChat hosts and topics are announced weeks in advance, but since this is my first week as the organizer of #ECRChat for the western hemisphere, I’ll probably be the one hosting. Hopefully we will see you on Thursday September 13th at 1pm PST on Twitter! If you do have a topic in mind and/or want to be a guest host, please by all means drop a comment on the blog or contact me via email.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with .


On the importance of fieldwork for empirical research in public policy

While I acknowledge myself as a multi-methods scholar, and I have done quantitative work, much of my empirical work involves qualitative data. Conducting structured and semi-structured interviews, engaging in participant observation, and running focus groups, are all forms of qualitative research. My work studying the Lerma-Chapala river basin council involved sitting in dozens of meetings of the river basin council, listening to participants, collecting field notes and (later) analyzing them looking for specific patterns (see for an example Pacheco-Vega 2011a).

Linea Verde (Aguascalientes, Ags)

I recently participated in a field visit to the Linea Verde in Aguascalientes, in the context of the National Prize for Local Government Effectiveness (I’m loosely translating here – you can read more about the Premio Gobierno y Gestion Local here, in Spanish). The local government of Aguascalientes (and their project, Linea Verde, which translates as “green line” and is a 6 km linear park intended to provide more green spaces for recreational activities in impoverished urban areas) is a finalist in the 2012 competition for the PGGL.

Linea Verde (Aguascalientes, Ags)

I joined a group of experts who undertake the assessment for PGGL and participated in the walk-through on site. Obviously, I expected government officials to provide the official version of what the project was intended for, and how successful it was. But what really stood out for me was that a number of people (in particular, 2 women who live in the area) recognized the substantial positive impact this project had had. None of them knew our group was there to undertake a field assessment of the project and its success, but by virtue of conversing with us, they provided us with insight we would have not had otherwise. I would have been unable to see elements of the project that were relevant to my own research (like the fact that the park uses only treated wastewater for irrigation) had I not gone on the field.

Linea Verde (Aguascalientes, Ags)

A fellow professor (and strangely, a more senior scholar than me) asked me why do I often go on the field with my own students, and my answer was “to show them how to conduct fieldwork the right way… that’s what I am supposed to be doing; otherwise, how would they know how to conduct an interview?.

I am taking on more work and projects and obviously, at some point I won’t be able to do as much fieldwork as I want to (and my graduate students will probably be doing the bulk of the work on the field), but a scholar who values his/her research I think should engage in fieldwork at least once a year. I am not sure I can take someone who does empirical research that involves qualitative data who does not go on the field him/herself seriously.

I think that public policy is one of those scholarly areas where fieldwork is essential. You can’t seriously assess the impact a program or a policy has had only by running sophisticated mathematical models. These do provide great insight, admittedly (and I love mathematical modelling, to be quite honest). But I think field assessments are essential to our systematic study of public policy implementation and evaluation. My own work is very much based on field assessments (see for example Pacheco-Vega, Weibust and Fox 2010) and I plan to continue working along these lines.

Hat tips to Rhonda Ragsdale for sharing this guide to field notes, very relevant to what I’m discussing here.

Posted in bridging media and academia.

Tagged with , , .


Advice for my #UBC would-be students as you come back to school

When I announced publicly that I had left UBC Political Science to take up a position at CIDE Region Centro, I received some of the most amazing and positive feedback. Everyone who knew me at UBC (either because they were my colleagues, or because they took a course with me, or because they heard great things about my teaching and my courses) felt sad that I was leaving UBC but happy for me in my new position.

I will fully admit to feeling incredibly torn, particularly because I promised a number of my former students (and numerous would-be students) that they would get another chance at taking a course with me (either because they wanted to earn the famous “I Survived X Courses With Dr. Pacheco-Vega” diploma, or simply because they enjoyed my teaching style). On the topic of the Pacheco-Vega course survival diploma, all of you who earned it, I have it with me, so I’ll give it to you next time I’m in Vancouver, or I will mail it to you, gladly.

I felt torn because on the one hand, I wanted to take up this amazing position (and at the same time, be physically and geographically closer to my parents), but on the other hand, I did not want to leave my students behind. I would have paid good money to be able to clone myself just so that those students I promised they’d be able to take another course with me would be able to do so.

Thus, in the spirit of the back-to-school day, here are some pieces of advice I give my students every beginning of the year, in one way or another.

1. Work hard. All the time. This piece of advice seems kind of ridiculous, since we are talking about undergraduate students at one of the most prestigious universities in Canada, but it has been my experience that when the pressures of work (most of my undergraduate students at UBC worked part- or full-time to pay for their own studies) and extracurricular commitments, school work often takes a second seat. Don’t do that. We (professors) will notice you are slacking and we will not appreciate it. Particularly if (like me) we put in so much work into our teaching.

2. Remember you’re human. Take time off. This would sound a bit contradictory since I just told you to work hard. But as the saying goes, “no play makes Jack/Jill dull”. It’s so true. Take time off. Go for a walk. Sit down and enjoy the (rather non-existent for most of the year, in Vancouver) sunshine.

3. Talk to your professors. We are here for you. REALLY. Some people (including a couple of students) criticized me for my personal approach to teaching. I often reminded my students that I, too, was human and that I understood when they were facing challenges, because *I* had been facing challenges in the past three years too. But I always felt validated when students of mine would approach me to ask for my opinion, or mentorship, even when it meant that they needed to open up about some very personal stuff. I felt privileged that they would approach me for advice, and I did the best I could to help. I am sure that most of my fellow faculty members, while incredibly busy, will always understand that life happens and you should be prepared to talk to your professors and be honest when you are struggling. There is an entire system built around helping you succeed. And our goal, as your professors (mine, most certainly!) is to help you succeed.

4. Take courses you find relevant/interesting/useful, not courses you need to earn the 3 credits or boost your grades. I always joked with my students on the first day of class that I completely understood if they took my courses because they needed the 3 credits. I made them work incredibly hard, and they realized after the fact that they were in fact learning, a lot, about public policy (and/or environmental politics). Take the courses you think will put you in a better position to face working life after graduation.

5. Use your courses to build your skills. My courses are, for the most part, very applied. Public Policy taught my students how to undertake policy analysis, and I made them do applied research and write policy-analytical memos. By providing them with opportunities to take on real-world problems and tackle them in the safe environment of a classroom, I was able to enhance their self-confidence in their abilities to write stuff that policy makers would want to read. You can do the same: use every course (whether it’s theory, or methods) to enhance the skills that you will need come graduation. I always say to my students that I teach them employable skills, and for the most part, I think they realize that this is the case.

6. Get involved in student life. I have been lucky to have amongst my students former Presidents of the Alma Mater Society, VicePresidents of AMS, Presidents of the Arts Undergraduate Society, and many other participants in student life. This is one of the things that will enrich both your life and your resume. Make sure you participate in committees/student groups where you can see yourself working as a professional. This will enable you to build great skills towards the future.

7. Learn to work in groups. That IS how we work in postgraduation life. Some of my students were dismayed to find that I required of them to work in teams. After all, there’s always the fear of someone not picking up their own weight and work together. But I think for the most part, my students have always been able to work together and some of them have built long-lasting friendships after those team projects. And that’s how real life works: we work in teams, we don’t work alone (even us, academics!).

8. Network, network, network. I will fully admit that the minute I learned that over 45% of the Spaniard youth (18-25) is unemployed, according to a Spaniard professor I chatted with on the bus as I was heading to the university a couple of years ago, I freaked out. I have had hundreds of students in my years at UBC and elsewhere, and I always have taught courses that build employable/hireable skills. And I maintain a close connection with my former students as many of them approach me to write them letters of reference, so I have my fingers on the pulse of how the job market is. And I know it’s tough. So, whenever given an opportunity, NETWORK! Talk to guest lecturers in courses, participate in seminars, lectures and open events, conferences, etc. Always make sure to introduce yourself, and carry business cards (even if you are still an undergraduate, it never hurts to present a professional appearance).

On that note, and this is very much for my former students, both graduated and still at UBC: remember I’m always only as far away as a tweet, a Facebook wall post, or an email. I may not be in Vancouver physically, but I will *always* be your professor, and you can always count on me if you need me.

Enjoy your first day back to school for the 2012-2013 academic year!

Posted in teaching.

Tagged with .


Using the #ScholarSunday hashtag as a #FollowFriday for academics

I’ve never been a fan of the #FollowFriday hashtag, as it often reads like a popularity contest.

Have you seen a tweet including #FollowFriday (or #ff shortened) and a list of user names preceded by the @ symbol? This tradition was born spontaneously within the Twitter community to recommend your favorite tweeps to your followers.

It occurred to me a few months ago that I do, in fact, want to recommend academics to follow, simply because I think their tweets are informative. Also, because I follow my own students (former students, as this 2012-2013 I’m not teaching), and they follow me too, often they may also choose to follow some of the academics, graduate students, professors and alike that I do follow.

So why #ScholarSunday? Simply for two facts. First, because Sunday is the only day I have to sit down and relax, and take some time to review who I follow, and second, because Sunday has the same first letter as scholar (much like other hashtags, #TravelTuesday, #WineWednesday and #FoodFriday or #FollowFriday). Simple mnemonic trick.

I do encourage you, if you are an academic, to use the #ScholarSunday hashtag to recommend some new Twitter users to your followers. I follow scholars in a very broad range of disciplines, from neuroscience to digital history, and I have learned a lot from them. Perhaps you will, too.

Posted in bridging academia and practice.

Tagged with .


On the importance of networking in academic settings

I am currently participating in the National Meeting of the Thematic Network for Poverty and Urban Development in Mexico (luckily, being held in Aguascalientes, where I am based right now). This meeting is a self-organizing group of Mexican scholars (or foreign scholars who now teach at Mexican universities) and sponsored by the National Research Council of Mexico (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia). You can read some of my tweets about the meeting using the hashtag #MxPovertyUD.

Red Tematica de Investigacion sobre Pobreza y Desarrollo Urbano

While my work on poverty is rather preliminary (I am currently working on a water and poverty energy project with Dr. Hisham Zerriffi from the Liu Institute for Global Issues at UBC), I was delighted to be invited to this event, because at the very core, my research is driven by a philosophy focused on poverty alleviation and narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor. What this meeting reminded me of was that in academia, as in any other professional activity, you are who you know. And by this I mean, it IS very important to attend conferences, seminars, scholarly meetings and a broad variety of forums to network with other scholars, or with policy makers who might be also the users of our research.

Red Tematica de Investigacion sobre Pobreza y Desarrollo Urbano

I do consider myself a public intellectual. I strongly believe that a large part of my role is to share my research widely (hence the #MyResearch hashtag, although sadly it has experienced some hashtag pollution and interference). Networking in policy circles or academic settings enables me to share my research with more people, and by introducing myself in person to other colleagues, I often find new avenues, methodological approaches and/or suggestions of case studies.

One of the pieces of (unsolicited) advice I always give my students is to network, network, network. Attend seminars, even if they’re not in the core area of what you are studying. Attend conferences. Present your work. Be a part of policy discussion roundtables. Participate in public forums where politicians can be reached more easily.

I not only encourage my students, but I often build those network relationships with policy makers and other scholars myself. Last year, for example, I brought with me a group of students from my POLI350A class (Public Policy) to a public debate where mayoral candidates for Vancouver were debating. After the debate, we sat down at a lounge and discussed what we learned from the process.

Another strategy I use is to bring the network connections to my students. Every term, I brought guest lecturers (amongst these, policy makers like Minister of Advanced Education in British Columbia Naomi Yamamoto, or other scholars I respect, like Dr. Janni Aragon from University of Victoria’s Political Science department, or practitioners, such as Mat Wright, who is a political communications advisor). By bringing these folks to meet my students, I enable small, one-on-one conversations that might derive either in an internship, a directed study seminar or even just a personal connection that can be of use for my students in the future.

Networking is perhaps one of the most shunned activities in academia, but I can’t emphasize enough its importance. For students and for professors alike. Networking enables academics like me to better fulfil our role as public intellectuals as well, I believe.

Posted in bridging academia and practice.

Tagged with .


Reading academic literature beyond individual disciplinary boundaries

DSC02297

Photo credit: DylerPillar

As a young (and naive) undergraduate student in chemical engineering, I always believed in the power of interdisciplinarity. My brothers were all engineers (like me) but of different specializations: civil, mechanical, electrical. Our studies crossed paths because we shared some common coursework (and my brothers were always on hand to explain to me how to calculate heat exchangers, for example).

When I decided to undertake graduate work in the administrative sciences, I figured I had jumped ship on to “greener pastures”. Yet what I found in management science literature was that it borrowed from different disciplines to build its explanatory frameworks. My Masters’ thesis topic (understanding strategic alliances) used literature from the hard-core microeconomic and industrial organization fields (I built a game-theoretic approach to alliance-building). It also used scholarship from the economic sociology and anthropology bodies of work.

While fully confessing that my doctoral training was primarily in the political science (comparative politics of public policy) field, my other major field was human geography (specifically, business geography/industrial geography/economic geography/urban geography). At the same time, my former PhD supervisor was a physicist who turned to policy analysis (and thus he valued interdisciplinarity in scholarly work).

My doctoral dissertation built an interdisciplinary framework that borrowed from the policy sciences, economic geography, comparative politics, economic sociology and anthropology, in an integrated assessment of industrial clusters’ restructuring. To be quite honest, I love what I did with my dissertation, and its interdisciplinary nature. One of the challenges I have faced given that I have taught in a department of Political Science for the past 6-7 years is that I find political science sometimes a bit insular and guarded from approaching problems from a truly interdisciplinary perspective. This isn’t a problem specific to a department, but I think it is a reflection of how universities in Canada (and for the most part, from an anecdotal perspective, it looks like this is the case worldwide) approach interdisciplinary work: “we want you to be able to do interdisciplinary work, but your PhD needs to be in a specific discipline“. This approach, I think, precludes students and faculty members from really broadening their perspectives and learning from other disciplines.

I began a dialogue with other scholarship even before I graduated from my PhD, and I am grateful to my advisors (both Masters and PhD) for letting me engage in truly interdisciplinary work. The rewards from working beyond my traditional discipline (political science, in this case) are numerous, but unfortunately there is a big challenge: reading beyond individual disciplinary boundaries means that I spend a large (somewhat inordinate) amount of time keeping up-to-date with scholarship in all these fields. I have set up email alerts that send me tables of content from several journals in geography, economics, political science, public administration, sociology, history, and even in the chemical engineering, environmental engineering realms. But to truly stay on top of all these published journals is proving a big challenge.

I am wondering how other scholars approach this problem. Feel free to chime on the comments section.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with .


Beyond the Culture of Nature: Rethinking Canadian and Environmental Studies (call for papers, Journal of Canadian Studies)

While my geographical area of specialization is originally North America (Canada, the United States of America and Mexico in a comparative perspective), I have been considering undertaking more work on Canadian studies, particularly because (a) I taught (and continue to be affiliated with) one of Canada’s best and most reputable universities, (b) I lived in Canada for the better part of a decade, (c) I have taught the Canadian versions of Public Policy and Environmental Politics and (d) I have taught hundreds of Canadian students and share scholarly goals with many Canadian professors and colleagues.

Canadian Flag flower bed

Photo credit: SonSon on Flickr

While currently based in Mexico, I still hold a very strong scholarly interest in Canada, and thus I thought I’d share the most recent call for papers for the Journal of Canadian Studies on Canadian and environmental studies. I am copying and pasting the call for papers below. The special issue will be edited by someone I respect a lot in the field of Canadian water history and Canadian environmental history, Dr. Matthew Evenden, an Associate Professor at UBC Geography.

Call for Papers: Beyond the Culture of Nature: Rethinking Canadian and Environmental Studies
Theme Issue of the Journal of Canadian Studies
Guest Editor: Matthew Evenden

Canadian and Environmental Studies are two fields in transformation. Initiated in part as emancipatory projects in the 1970s, seeking to define subjects and articulate their meanings, the two fields have diverged and been complicated by shifting ideas about nation and nationalism on the one hand, and the environment and sustainability on the other. Wilderness once stood as a central shared concern of the two fields, but constructivist critiques have highlighted its associations with race, gender, settler societies and social power, and the discourse of sustainability has transcended wilderness as a cultural and linguistic artifact, reliant on a binary vision of nature and culture. This special issue asks what has replaced the culture of nature that once provided common ground for Canadian and Environmental Studies? How do area and interdisciplinary studies intersect, and with what benefits and problems? Does a shared agenda remain? This special issue will consider the evolving relationship between Canadian and Environmental Studies scholarship and imagine their intertwined futures.

Possible paper topics include:
– The place of nature in Canadian Studies
– The place of Canada in Environmental Studies
– What’s left of wilderness and the culture of nature?
– Understanding Canada, regions and places in a world of global flows and environmental processes

Academics and graduate students nearing completion of a PhD are invited to submit 250-word abstracts for consideration. The deadline for abstracts is 1 September 2012. Papers selected for submission should be made available by 1 December 2012. All papers will undergo a formal peer review process through the Journal of Canadian Studies. Completed abstracts or questions should be directed to the guest editor, Matthew Evenden, at matthew(.)evenden(@)ubc(.)ca

Appel de communications
Au-delà de la culture de la nature : Repenser les études canadiennes et environnementales.
Numéro thématique de la Revue d’études canadiennes
Rédacteur invité : Matthew Evenden

Les études canadiennes et les études environnementales sont deux champs en transformation. Entrepris en partie en tant que projets émancipatoires au cours des années 1970, cherchant à définir des sujets et à élaborer leurs significations, ces deux champs d’études ont divergé et se sont complexifiés en même temps que les notions de nation et de nationalisme, ainsi que celles d’environnement et de durabilité, se recomposaient. Autrefois une préoccupation commune de ces deux champs, la nature sauvage (wilderness) est dorénavant associée par les critiques constructivistes à la race, au genre, aux sociétés coloniales et au pouvoir social. Quant au discours sur la durabilité, il a transcendé la nature sauvage en tant qu’artefact culturel et linguistique, tributaire d’une vision binaire de la nature et de la culture. Le présent numéro spécial s’interroge sur ce qui a remplacé la culture de la nature en tant que point commun des études canadiennes et environnementales. Comment est-ce que les études régionales (area studies) et les études interdisciplinaires s’entrecoupent, avec quels bénéfices et quels problèmes? Existe-t-il encore des points de convergence? Ce numéro spécial cherche à rassembler les chercheurs en études canadiennes et environnementales pour discuter et débattre de la relation entre les deux champs d’études et imaginer un avenir commun.

Thèmes de recherche possibles :
– La place de la nature dans les études canadiennes
– La place du Canada dans les études environnementales
– Que reste-il de la nature sauvage et de la culture de la nature?
– Comprendre le Canada, les régions et les lieux dans un monde de circulations globales et de processus environnementaux.

Les universitaires et les étudiants de troisième cycle qui obtiendront bientôt leur doctorat sont invités à soumettre des résumés de 250 mots pour évaluation. La date limite de soumission des résumés est le 1er septembre 2012. Les manuscrits qui seront retenus doivent être remis au plus tard le 1er décembre 2012. Ils feront tous l’objet d’une évaluation formelle par les pairs organisée par la Revue d’études canadiennes. Vous pouvez faire parvenir vos résumés terminés ou vos questions au rédacteur invité, Matthew Evenden, à matthew(.)evenden(@)ubc(.)ca.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


Joining CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, Mexico as an Assistant Professor

My office

I’m proud to announce that as of July 1st, 2012 I have joined the Public Administration Division of CIDE (Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, AC – Center for Economic Teaching and Research) as a tenure-track Assistant Professor. My geographical base will be the new campus of CIDE, CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, the capital city of the state of Aguascalientes, in central Mexico.

CIDE is a research centre and a teaching institution as well, highly regarded worldwide as the Harvard of Mexico. Faculty here are either Mexican nationals who did their PhDs abroad or foreigners with PhDs, everyone from excellent universities worldwide. CIDE professors are world-class scholars and the camaraderie and collegiality here has been outstanding. While my office is at CIDE Region Centro, I will coordinate a research programme that will require me to travel to the main CIDE Santa Fe campus on a regular basis, in Mexico City.

Given the regional focus of CIDE Region Centro, my scholarly agenda is perfectly suited for its long-term goals. The Department of Political Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC), my academic home since 2006, has been incredibly supportive of my move to Mexico and I plan to continue as Affiliated Faculty. I will also remain Affiliated Faculty in the Latin American Studies Programme at UBC.

Of course, I will continue to mentor my former students from UBC, particularly those who are collaborating with me on several scholarly writing pieces. UBC is not only my alma mater, but also the place where my scholarly research blossomed and where I gained a lot of experience teaching amazing students. I want to apologize to those of you who were hoping to take a course with me in the 2012-2013 academic year, but fear not. I am hoping to come back to teach at some point (most likely summer compressed courses or perhaps a full year as a Visiting Scholar). And whether or not I am at UBC physically, I will maintain my scholarly affiliation with UBC Political Science and with the university at large, and will always support its endeavours. It is, after all, my alma mater!

I want to thank the department of Political Science at UBC for providing an amazing scholarly home and my fellow faculty members for being wonderful and supportive colleagues. I also want to thank the hundreds of brilliant students who took my courses: you challenged me to be a better educator and I hope I rose to the challenge. I want to thank my former students who have collaborated with me through the years in my scholarly research agenda: your enthusiasm and hard work makes me incredibly proud of who you are and who you are becoming. And I also want to thank CIDE for an amazing opportunity to expand the research programme I consolidated in the past few years. I can’t think of a better scholarly home for me.

Dr. Raul Pacheco-Vega - Photo by Geoff Lister

Posted in research.

Tagged with , , .


SSHRC’s new guidelines, time to PhD completion and the challenges facing doctoral students

I woke up this morning to news of SSHRC (the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) making substantial changes to its Talent Program. As a scholar who has taught in Canadian universities (and someone who completed a PhD in Canada), I am familiar enough with how SSHRC programmes have evolved throughout the years, and I have reasons to be concerned.

Funding for my doctoral degree did not come from SSHRC as I wasn’t a Canadian citizen nor a landed immigrant at the time, I was funded by the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), who also changed their policies and guidelines for PhD funding as I was completing my PhD (sadly, the changes weren’t retroactive so they didn’t benefit me). Originally, CONACyT funded only 3 years of the PhD process, and then they expanded to 4 and 5 years (which I find reasonable).

However, in what I find a strange move, now SSHRC is changing its funding to apply to only 3 years of the PhD process.

Implement changes to those funding opportunities offering direct support to graduate students and postdoctoral researchers (Doctoral Funding)

Align the duration of funding under the SSHRC Doctoral Fellowships with the Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships (CGS) Doctoral Scholarships and the Vanier CGS Doctoral Scholarships by setting a consistent, maximum duration of three years.

This is, in my view, quite worrisome. First, it assumes that a PhD can be either completed in 3 years or income can be supplemented in the first few years with alternative sources of income. So far, I have not met ONE person in my entirely life who has completed a PhD in 3 years. One could argue “well, you can find other sources of funding for the first 1-2 years of the PhD and finish in 5”. But how many Canadian PhDs (in fact, how many PhDs overall) finish *easily* in 4 or 5 years? There are rare cases, in my view, of History PhDs who have completed in 4 or 5, but I know of others who have taken up to 9 or 10 years. And in my field, a comparativist PhD thesis may take up to 6-7 depending on length of fieldwork.

Some universities cap program length (e.g. number of years you can be registered as a PhD student) at 8 or 9 years. But as I can personally be witness to, life does happen. So, what if a PhD student has had a number of problems that hindered his/her progress? With so many challenges facing higher education, and higher PhD attrition rates, I think what we ought to do is create safeguards and mechanisms to ensure that those who already embarked in the PhD process can complete.

Second, and the reason why I am more concerned, is that changes in SSHRC policy will not be reflected fast enough in the Canadian higher education system. Even if university departments know that now SSHRC enables you to apply your doctoral funding for any of the 5 years your PhD is supposed to take you to complete, what safeguards exist to make sure that departments won’t bias internal application choice towards early-stage PhD students, rather than towards students who may be taking longer but may need the funding more?

These are some rough thoughts, and I welcome any and all feedback (please leave in the comments section, as I can Storify your tweets, but I prefer a more permanent record). Thanks to Ian Milligan for sparking this discussion and offering his own thoughts.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , .