Skip to content


My Top 10 academic productivity tips, or how I submitted 5 pieces in 3 weeks

In the past 3 weeks, I have submitted a total of 2 journal manuscripts (two in Spanish, one in English), 1 conference paper (in English), 1 book chapter (in Spanish) and one co-authored grant proposal (in English). In addition, I have about 8 manuscripts at various stages of development (for the most part, almost completed). You may think that this is bragging (or pure insanity, depending on your viewpoint). The reality is that this is about what I expected.

Ostrom research

I have been writing every day for at least 2 hours (although I have calculated that in the past 2 weeks I’ve clocked about 60 hours of writing). The first thing I do when I wake up is make a pot of coffee, make my bed, start my computer and begin writing (you can read my Top 10 Tips for Academic Writing here). But being productive and having done the research and only writing it up is not enough. I needed to start feeling like I was achieving something.

So I began submitting the manuscripts. Not only did I write, but I let them go off my desk. It helps when you have deadlines, be it self-imposed or externally requested. I still have one book chapter (in English) and two journal article manuscripts (one in English, one in Spanish) that I need to polish and send off, on top of two book reviews. But seeing my production on Friday evening, mapping out in a document my output and research trajectory and clearing up my desk made me feel incredibly happy.

So, how did I manage to submit 4 manuscripts and a grant proposal in two different languages in less than a month? There are a number of factors that have increased my productivity manyfold.

1. Writing every day. No day goes by (including Saturdays and Sundays) when I don’t write at least for 2 hours solid, even if it is in 4 chunks of 30 minutes each.

My method of doing scholarly research

2. Full teaching release. I know, I’m lucky that way. I am not teaching 2012-2013 (although that’s going to stop in the fall and I’m probably getting a 1-2 or 2-2 teaching load, which probably will hinder my productivity).

3. A small army of research assistants. I have 6 research assistants in Mexico, each of whom is working with me on a different project. In addition, I have 4 research students in Canada and 1 in the United States, all of whom are co-authoring research papers with me. Thus, I am getting a lot of help. While I work on one manuscript with the dataset that one of my RAs assembles, the rest are working on something different. I have a very strong work ethic with my research assistants (you can read my philosophy of working with RAs here).

4. Working in parallel on several projects at the time. This is something that may sound weird to other academics, but I actually find it intellectually stimulating to work in parallel. Write bits of one piece here, bits of another piece there. Of course, as each piece nears completion (and some are completed faster than others), I focus more on that one so that it leaves my desk (or computer, as it may be).

My research output in the past couple of months

5. Submit, submit, submit. The reality is, we are all our worst critics. Every time I read one of my manuscripts, I think that there is something that needs to be improved. So I have learned, through time, to make sure that I don’t submit shoddy work, but I also try to strike a delicate balance with keeping manuscripts in the back burner. I prefer to get them out, get feedback (rejected, revise-and-resubmit, or if I’m lucky, accepted) than keeping them in my computer’s hard drive. I also keep track of which projects I am working on in my office’s whiteboard, and I check-mark those that I have already submitted. By visually keeping track of where I am at, and what I have accomplished, I can sense my own progress.

My method of doing scholarly research

6. Create the best office environment to work. I have set up a home office both at my parents’ place and at my house in Aguascalientes. I have strong wifi, a printer in each one of them, printer, book/paper holder, corkboard and whiteboard, solid office chairs and a sturdy desk, as well as a small fortune in stationery and office supplies. Because I work first thing in the morning, and sometimes at night, I always ensure I have the best setup for working at home. The same occurs at my office at the university. Every so often I will clear up my desk and rearrange my organizing system so that I can have a clear office and desk. Cluttered workspace, cluttered mind or so they say.

My office desk (clean and spotless after clearing up my to-do list)

7. Be organized and disciplined. This is perhaps the biggest challenge I face. You can see my office when it’s perfectly organized, but every few weeks/a month I reorganize my office space and my list of priorities. Writing is always the top one.

How I write an academic paper

8. Learn to say NO. This was something that made me really proud. I did miss several international conferences I was scheduled to present at (and I had already even written the papers), but others I actually said no to. Two of them were in fact complicating my life so much that I was supposed to be in Los Angeles on a Thursday, Denver on a Friday and Chicago on a Saturday. I also said NO to a conference in Vancouver (Canada) when I would have had to be in Tokyo (Japan). The logistics would have been impossible in both cases.

9. Don’t get discouraged and keep going. This week I also received 2 rejections (one, a journal article that I actually thought was a slam-dunk, and a grant proposal I also thought was a done deal). Instead of pouting, I’ve been focusing on completing other pieces and submitting additional grant proposals. I can’t let small setbacks create big obstacles. I also rewarded myself by giving myself permission to pout and be angry. And then I began working on another grant proposal.

10. Reward yourself after completing pieces. This is a piece of advice I received from my friend Jo VanEvery, who emphasizes that you should acknowledge what you’ve accomplished (Jo also happens to be an academic coach). I reward myself when I complete a piece of writing. Be it having dinner at my house and a glass of wine, or heading downtown Aguascalientes and having the best tamales in the entire world, or visiting my parents at their hometown and going for brunch with them, or having chocolate, I give myself a reward which also works as an incentive to keep writing.

I’m well aware that my productivity tips are (some of them, at least) very specific to my personal circumstances. Not everyone can have a small army of research assistants, or full teaching release. But I think the overall gist of my post can be applied to anyone. If you set aside 2 hours of writing (as my other guru, Tanya Golash-Boza indicates on her blog) every single day, you can accomplish a lot. Heck you can accomplish a lot in 30 minute increments (as Aimee Morrison suggests)!

Hopefully my advice is helpful to fellow academic writers. I actually wrote it for myself, but it doesn’t hurt to share it with the world. This post also helps me reflect on my own habits and behaviour and correct them when they’re not working well.

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , .


Dr. Kathy Baylis on forest conservation policies in Mexico at CIDE Region Centro

As part of the Regional Studies programme at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, last week we had Dr. Kathy Baylis (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) give an invited seminar on forest conservation policies in central Mexico. Kathy and I knew each other from our previous positions (we both were faculty members at The University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, Kathy in the faculty of Land and Food Systems and I in the faculty of Arts, in the Department of Political Science), so it was great to get an opportunity to see each other again and catch up.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

While I’m a fan of spatial econometrics (no secret to anyone who knows me), I think what I enjoyed the most about Kathy’s seminar was her instructional approach to explaining the research she is currently undertaking with colleagues in the US and Mexico. We had a lot of students and research assistants in the audience, and I think they all benefited from Kathy explaining things to a very easy-to-digest level. Kathy and her colleagues’ paper explored a patchwork of conservation policies in the Monarch butterfly habitat in Michoacan. I’m well aware of how this area has been (unfortunately) a forested area that is sometimes mismanaged.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

In the paper she presented Kathy and her colleagues investigated the effect of management, logging bans and protected area regulations. As I argued in her talk, one of the biggest challenges Kathy and her colleagues will encounter will be finding ways to create indicators of good resource governance (something I’ve been working on for the past few years, albeit in the water field).

I was also really proud to showcase how our university campus can handle interactions via videoconferencing , as we had several seminar participants from the main campus of CIDE in Santa Fe (Mexico City). Frankly, the more international seminars we organize, the prouder I feel of being at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes. We have the human capital and the technology to disseminate our scholarship widely, and this does make me proud.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

I look forward to continuing these conversations with Kathy and my fellow CIDE colleagues, as I think that policy evaluation is one of the least researched areas of public policy analysis, and one I have maintained an interest in and worked for many years. Moreover, I really enjoyed how a multidisciplinary perspective provided Kathy with a very different view of what her paper would contribute if she had only presented to a purely-economics audience. I think the benefits of interdisciplinarity speak for themselves.

Posted in academia, policy analysis, policy instruments, research, research methods.

Tagged with , , , .


Making time to read and reflect: Writing a literature review

Home office at my parentsWhile I would like to say that I’m able to stretch the 24 hours in a day to fit in time to read EVERY DAY (which is one of the pieces of advice I don’t think I could ever give, much as I’d love to do it myself), I do try to make time to fit some reading every day. This is hard because, like any professor, I have to deal with meetings, answering emails, reviewing books and journal manuscripts, doing my own academic writing, and every other thing that comes up. As Melonie Fullick aptly puts it, it’s harder and harder to find time for deep reflection.

Research books 001Most people who read my research blog will know that the time I use for deep reflection, thinking and writing is the wee hours of the morning. I wake up at 4:45am every single morning and the first two hours of the day I do nothing but research. Specifically, I write (and I write EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK, 7 DAYS A WEEK). To aid me in my relentless pursuit of “a time to read”, I have implemented 2 strategies that have worked wonders:

My research workflow and planning processFirst, I commit to writing a full paper. That is, I don’t attend a conference unless I am writing a full paper that I then will upgrade with the commentary and critique I receive and submit to a peer-reviewed journal. I have now built a workflow and process where I write my priorities as a list and then I note besides them a “check mark” when they’ve been completed. I also wrote the mantra “submit, submit, submit” to motivate me to NOT keep a paper with me for long, but just submit it for peer-review.

My research workflow and note-takingSecond, I write a literature review for each paper. This means that I go back to the graduate school method of highlighting journal articles with pens, writing notes about the literature by hand, on paper. Of course, I also use Evernote to clip relevant research tidbits and articles, and I annotate PDFs on Mendeley. And I have a modified method of computerized note-taking that vaguely resembles the Cornell Notes method (though mine is much more thorough).

Writing a literature review for each paper I publish forces me to go back to the body of scholarship, and to budget enough time to read whatever works I have visualized including in my paper. Knowing that I have 25 papers on a specific topic to read, summarize them, write notes on each, makes me be way more efficient about how I use my time (and often forces me to block even more time to just read).

Finding the time to think deeply and reflect (one of the tenets of academic life) is not a problem only for academics. Other busy folks find creative ways to think and reflect (read here, and here for but two examples).

I also find that getting away from the city where my university is located every weekend (I visit my parents in their hometown) also gives me time to think and reflect. Since many times I bus instead of driving down, I use those two hours to read and reflect on what scholarship I’m working on.

Finally, another way in which I have found time to reflect and think is by going on long walks with friends, be them academics or otherwise. By verbalizing what I am working on, I am forced to think deeply about the direction in which my research is going.

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , .


Transboundary water governance: Many questions, not so many answers

I have been studying transboundary water governance for a few years now, and one of the things that strikes me the most is that we still have many more questions on how to build strong and resilient institutions to govern water bodies that cross nation-state boundaries than we do have answers. For example, in the Northern part of Mexico, the US-Mexico border faces many environmental challenges, water being one of the most important ones. The US-Mexico 1944 treaty was supposed to establish cross-national institutions to govern how water was distributed across the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo basin.

river flow

However, there is still much source of conflict in transboundary water resource sharing. The West Bank area shares water bodies and there is still enormous conflict there. Many countries share transboundary water bodies. As the UN Water website indicates:

There are 276 transboundary river basins in the world (64 transboundary river basins in Africa, 60 in Asia, 68 in Europe, 46 in North America and 38 in South America). 185 out of the 276 transboundary river basins, about two-thirds, are shared by two countries. 256 out of 276 are shared by 2, 3 or 4 countries (92,7%), and 20 out of 276 are shared by 5 or more countries (7,2%), the maximum being 18 countries sharing a same transboundary river basin (Danube). 46% of the globe’s (terrestrial) surface is covered by transboundary river basins. 148 countries include territory within one or more transboundary river basins. 39 countries have more than 90% of their territory within one or more transboundary river basins, and 21 lie entirely within one or more of these watersheds. The Russian Federation shares 30 transboundary river basins with riparian countries, Chile and United States 19, Argentina and China 18, Canada 15, Guinea 14, Guatemala 13, and France 10.

2013 marks the Year of International Water Cooperation, and much as it is the trademark of the UN Water year, I’m not certain we know the proper mechanisms for transboundary water cooperation.

I recently participated in an international experts workshop on transboundary water governance and climatic change. At the workshop I presented preliminary work of mine where I compare how US-Canada and US-Mexico water governance initiatives are adapting to climatic change, and whether there is some explanation for the ways in which cross-border collaboration occurs.

Seminario Internacional Agua y Fronteras Frente al Cambio Climatico (COLEF-CIESAS Monterrey 2012)

I have also done other work on transboundary water governance. With Emelie Peacock, I have examined how well does a cooperation-conflict continuum tool (the Transboundary Water Interactions Nexus tool, TWINS) apply in a global environmental politics classroom setting. We also examined how useful TWINS was to analyze cross-border collaborative initiatives for transboundary water governance.

What I have learned in my research so far is that transboundary water governance requires robust cross-national collaboration that is then enshrined in strong international institutions. But we are still way too far to say that we have the answers that the world requires. There’s still much work to do!

Posted in water governance, World Water Day.

Tagged with , , .


On the divergence of water cooperation and water conflict bodies of scholarship

For the past couple of decades, I have been a scholar of cooperative behavior. I have studied how cooperation among agents occurs, within a broad variety of contexts. I have demonstrated that environmental activists build strategic relationships and form transnational coalitions to put pressure on nation states (Pacheco-Vega 2005a, b, Pacheco-Vega, Weibust and Fox 2010). I have also shown how lack of cooperation among state, federal and municipal governments hinders wastewater governance and limits the effectiveness of state-wide and basin-wide sanitation policies (Pacheco-Vega 2011, 2012, forthcoming). I have also shown how cities where clusters emerge naturally are more resilient to external shocks than cities that host “forced” industrial districts (Pacheco-Vega 2008, Pacheco and Dowlatabadi 2003, 2005, 2007, Pacheco-Vega forthcoming). I have become known for being a scholar of cooperation.

OECD Policy Dialogue on Water in Mexico

This year, by happen stance (I was researching a few Mexican cities’ urban water systems for a couple of comparative papers I’m presenting at Association of American Geographers and at Association of Borderland Studies) and began to find literature on water conflict. The strangest thing is that I have come to find that the bodies of literature are very, very different. As I mentioned on Twitter:

For example, if you want to learn how individuals self-organize to govern water as a common pool resource you need nothing more than look at the Elinor Ostrom (and collaborators’) bodies of work. Cooperation occurs when there are clear resource-sharing rules, among a number of other factors. However, if you want to understand conflict and design mechanisms to solve said conflict, you can look at the work of Larry Susskind, Barbara Gray, Heidi and Guy Burgess.

I’m fascinated by this apparent divergence, particularly because as I said, I have always seen myself as someone who seeks to understand patterns of cooperative behavior. One would think that just “flipping the coin on knowledge” would enable us to understand mechanisms of conflict resolution in disputes for water resources. But it doesn’t work in that exact way. 2013 will be a watershed year (yes, pun intended) for me, as it will be the year when I delve more into water conflict, more specifically intractable water conflict (e.g. conflicts that reach stalemates, are prolonged and appear seemingly non-solvable).

Chefs Across The Water in Salt Spring Island

I am currently working on a book project proposal on this very topic (following the work of Lewicki, Gray and Elliott), and specifically examining empirical case studies within Mexico. If you are thinking of working in this area for your Masters/PhD, feel free to contact me. I have already undertaken a substantive literature review and have submitted a book chapter and a journal manuscript on the topic for peer review.

Posted in water governance, water policy, World Water Day.

Tagged with , , , .


International Women’s Day 2013: Some thoughts on gender, water and sanitation

March 8th marks International Women’s Day, when we celebrate the achievements of women worldwide in various realms (economic, political, social). Women have had a very strong and positive impact on my own research agenda. I’m the son of a political science professor (my Mom is a specialist in federalism and intergovernmental relations), I collaborate with many female scholars, I have taught hundreds of incredibly bright young women and I continue to mentor and supervise female students.

One topic in which several of my undergraduate students wrote papers and I never had the time to delve into in depth has been the interrelationships between gender, water and sanitation. I’m also good friends with the founders of Vancouver-based social enterprise LunaPads, (Suzanne Siemens and Madeleine Shaw), who advocate for and support charities like One4Her. Through the conversations with my students, the founders of LunaPad and my friend and colleague Janni Aragon (who does research on gender and public policy) I’ve become more aware of the negative impact of lack of proper sanitation and access to water on women, which is pretty substantial.

Women and children carry water

Photo credit: (c) Ray Witlin/World Bank. Used with permission per CC license

Surveys from 45 developing countries show that women and children bear the primary responsibility for water collection in the majority of households. This is time not spent working at an income-generating job, caring for family members, or attending school. In just one day, it is estimated that more than 152 million hours of women and girls’ time is consumed for the most basic of human needs — collecting water for domestic use. [Source: Water.org]

Time spent collecting water is not the only negative effect of lack of access on women, but also distance travelled to fetch it.

On average women and children travel 10-15 kilometers per day collecting water and carrying up to 20 kilos or 15 litres per trip. Some 30% of women in Egypt walk over 1 hour a day to meet water needs. In some parts of Africa, women and children spend 8 hours a day collecting water [Source: Gender & Water Network]

The special need of girls and women during the time of menstruation must be taken into account (photo by Marni Sommer)

Photo credit: Sustainable Sanitation Alliance

Young girls often have to miss school during their menstrual periods, and lack of safe sanitation facilities has a strong deleterious effect, also potentially putting them in harm’s way and increasing their probability of facing violence.

In Kenya in Kibera, women on average walk 300 meters from their homes to use pit latrines making access dangerous for them and their children at night (Source: Amnesty International, 2010 – Water and Sanitation Programme)

Given my interest in vulnerable communities, I am keen to continue studying water and sanitation through a gender lens, and to help increase women’s access to proper sanitation facilities and to clean water. On International Women’s Day, I urge you to keep in mind the links between gender, water and sanitation, and to remember that lack of access to water and sanitation can potentially have a much more negative effect on women than on men. Think about it.

Posted in bridging academia and practice, sanitation, wastewater.

Tagged with , .


Dr. Kathryn Harrison (UBC Political Science) at #CIDE on the comparative politics of carbon pricing

I had the pleasure to host Dr. Kathryn Harrison (Professor, Department of Political Science at The University of British Columbia) at both campuses of CIDE, Santa Fe in Mexico City and Region Centro in Aguascalientes. Kathy has been a former professor, mentor, and then (when I became a faculty member at UBC Political Science), a fellow colleague, and someone whose work has inspired me to work in the comparative public policy field. Full disclosure: I love Kathy’s work and I have co-authored papers with her too, and I’m going to continue doing so in the near future on the comparative politics of carbon pricing in Mexico.

Dr. Kathryn Harrison at CIDE Santa Fe

Kathy came to visit from Vancouver (Canada) to Mexico City and Aguascalientes (Mexico) as an invited seminar presenter within the framework of the Permanent Seminar “New Frontiers in Environmental Policy Research“, which is a seminar series that I host every month since last September (2012). She presented a paper (with slight variations for each audience) on the comparative politics of carbon pricing in Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Kathy Harrison Visit Feb 28 Mar 1 - 2013 007

I found the paper fascinating and Kathy’s presentations incredibly insightful, and at both locations, we had excellent attendance and wonderful questions. I am particularly proud of how my colleagues at CIDE Region Centro asked questions that were intellectually challenging and stimulating for Kathy, and that those questions also helped me frame where my own research is located. Mexico is still in the very, very early stages of establishing carbon pricing schemes and thus there is fertile ground on undertaking this kind of research.

What I find also very interesting (and do note, I’m not a specialist in climate politics at all) is that, from what Kathy shared with us, once a carbon tax is implemented, it’s hard to get rid of it. You could almost see it from a path dependency perspective.

Dr. Kathryn Harrison at CIDE Santa Fe

Overall, it was a pleasure to have Kathy visit and share her scholarship with my colleagues, CIDE students, research assistants and members from the public. I think it was a great experience overall, especially to my students and research assistants as participating in a seminar of this calibre enables them to experience the broad variety of scholarship that is available in the field of environmental policy.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


Improving your academic writing: My top 10 tips

The topic of academic writing has been popular in the blogosphere and Twittersphere in the past couple of weeks. I think it all came from Stephen Walt’s Foreign Policy piece “On Writing Well“. Several fellow academics responded to Walt’s scathing critique of our scholarly writing (read Stephen Saideman, Jay Ulfelder, Dan Drezner, Marc Bellemare, Thomas Pepinsky, Greg Weeks, and I’m sure a few more that I missed. Yes, I also know that I linked to political science and public policy professors. There are two reasons for this. First, because they were the ones who responded to Walt’s critique and commented on it. Second, because I am largely trained as a public policy/political science scholar. I taught at a department of political science for 6 years and now I teach at one of public administration. My training comes largely from that academic field.

The above said, I have also written on this blog why I read widely, and across disciplines (I do the same on Twitter – I follow folks who are political scientists, educators, anthropologists, geographers, sociologists, computer scientists and mathematicians): because it broadens my learning spectrum, improves my writing skills, and enables me to write for very different audiences.

My research output in the past couple of months

You’ll see: I write differently if I am submitting a paper to Policy Sciences (a public policy journal) than if I am sending it to Water International (an area journal focusing on water). I write differently for a human geography audience than I do for a political science one. That was the very first piece of advice my PhD advisor gave me on writing: write for your audience. And that is, I think, an element that was missing in Walt’s piece: we write for specific audiences. I write differently a policy advice report than I do a public policy scholarly paper. The audiences are different, as are the goals of each piece of writing.

I can’t claim to say that everything I have learned from academic writing came from my own experiences. I have been mentored and have learned from my former PhD advisor, from my former doctoral committee, other faculty members, and from other folks I read. So while not attributing them to each person who taught me each, here are my top tips on academic writing. This is what I do to improve my own writing and may be of value for those of you seeking to improve yours.

1. Be disciplined and write every day.
Every morning, I wake up anywhere between 4:45am and 5:30am, I start a pot of coffee, make my bed, turn on my laptop and start writing. I have been writing for 2 hours every single day of the week (Saturdays and Sundays included) for the past little while and it has done wonders for my writing. I added 85 single spaced pages to my book, and produced 120 single-spaced pages in the past couple of months or so. I’d say that’s good productivity.

I had my carpenter build a paper holder for my office :)

2. Give yourself the best tools to write.
I grew up in an academic household, and thus my childhood bedroom also has a full-blown home office (complete with desktop computer and printer, and wireless internet). Because I travel to my parents’ city every single weekend to visit them, I know that I have the right setup to write. I also need to make sure that I have the tools to write anywhere I go, so I try to pack with me everything I need, including a paper holder. Recently, I bought a new computer chair for my home office at my parents’ place. I need to make sure that every piece of furniture I have enables my writing. Same goes for hardware and software. It was incredibly frustrating to have to switch computers because I only had EndNote in one of them (I now use Mendeley as a reference manager).

Home office at my Mom's

3. Write as you would speak (aka read aloud what you just wrote).
I remember that the first time one of my professors told me this I felt offended. I thought I wrote well! But as I have learned through time, if I write as I speak, my writing becomes clearer.

4. Have other people read your pieces to provide you with feedback.
This is a hard piece of advice to follow, as my writing often gets torn to pieces. It always comes out stronger, though. I learned (in this case, from my former PhD advisor) to take the feedback that people gave me to improve my writing. If I am not writing clearly, I need to work on how to write crisp, short, punchy, effective sentences.

5. Read a lot, and read across different disciplines.
My PhD itself is interdisciplinary, and the theoretical and analytical frameworks that I built for my doctoral dissertation borrowed from literature in anthropology, sociology, planning, human geography, chemical engineering. I’m a multi-methods guy, and I have done everything from institutional ethnography to GIS to social network analysis to structural equation modeling. I’m always on the lookout for innovative research methods. To this end, I read a lot (which of course takes a lot of time, I recognize) and I read across a variety of disciplines. Reading does improve your writing, as it enables you to see how other folks frame their thoughts and communicate them.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

6. Write for your audience.
Your writing style will vary if you write on a blog (like this one) to communicate to a broader audience than if your audience is policy-makers who need brief, concise analytical summaries of the literature and calls-to-action. You will be writing differently for your doctoral committee or for a political science journal than for an anthropology one. But always try to write clearly.

7. Write without interruptions
This is hard in today’s academic lifestyle: we are required to do more (because many administrative tasks like grant management, budget creation and day-to-day expense-tracking are being offloaded on to us). We also need to prepare lectures, write slides, design curricula, participate in committees, advise students, provide them with feedback on their writing. To counter this, I write in the morning (very early), and later in the afternoon/evening or late at night. I always make sure that nobody interrupts me (although when I’m visiting my parents doing this is sometimes hard as this is the only time we get to chat. When this is the case, I make sure to write late at night or very early in the morning so that I can hang out with them the rest of the day.

How I write an academic paper

8. Take care of yourself.
This is a very obvious one, but one that many academics fail to take into account. How does taking a break from writing (and from academic life) every so often help you write better? You can refresh your mind by exercising and taking care of your health and body. Your writing will improve if your health improves as well (and of course, if you devote time to it!)

9. Practice your writing. Write a lot.
And by write a lot, I don’t mean answer dozens of emails. Write lots of generative text, so that you can in turn shift around, rewrite, re-order and re-read your sentences and find ways to make them stronger. Recently, as the text of a book chapter that included lots of theory and lots of empirical research started growing longer than the length I had allowed, I realized that I could split it into one theoretical book chapter, and 2 empirical journal articles. I started with just one document, and I split enough text into three drafts that I now have the foundations of 3 pieces instead of just one. I do not feel that any of the writing I did was wasted at all.

Handwriting

10. When stuck, write by hand.
This piece of advice comes from someone who is a fan of online collaborative tools. I clip documents on Evernote all the time, upload PDFs to Mendeley for later reading and inserting citations into my writing and use Dropbox to share research with my collaborators, students and research assistants. So you may be surprised when you read that when I am stuck (and sometimes, even not when I am stuck but when I am writing a paper or an article) I write by hand. I particularly write by hand when I am creating new ideas or line-editing or when I need to fill gaps in my arguments.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , .


Dr. Kimberly Nolan García (DEI, CIDE Santa Fé) at CIDE Región Centro on North American labour politics

Dr. Kimberly Nolan García, my friend and colleague from the International Studies Division at CIDE (in the Santa Fé campus) came to CIDE Región Centro to visit, promote the undergraduate degree at CIDE Santa Fé here in Aguascalientes (we have a dual degree in Political Science and International Relations at CIDE Santa Fé, whereas our undergraduate degree here is on Government and Public Finance).

Dr. Kim Nolan (International Studies, CIDE Santa Fe) explaining her research

Kim also gave a couple of talks. I fully recognize how hard it is to do a talk for undergraduate levels, so kudos to her for making something that is somewhat foreign (labour rights in the context of North American politics) to students so easy to digest.

I found Kim’s talk really interesting because we do study similar stuff. I have looked at how environmental non-governmental organizations use the Citizen Submission on Enforcement Matters mechanism of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), whereas Kim has looked at the transnational dimensions of labour rights organizations and the use of a similar mechanism within the North American Agreement on Labour Cooperation (NAALC). An interesting paper that you may find useful from Kim is linked here.

In a similar fashion to what I and my coauthors found in Pacheco-Vega, Fox and Weibust (2010), Kim also finds that there is at least one country where the mechanism is not being used to a larger extent. In labour, as Nolan García demonstrates, it is Canada, whereas in environment, it is in the United States of America. Another interesting discussion worth having is the fact that in environment, CSEM is used to denounce countries’ national environmental law violations, whereas in the labour agreement, the mechanism is used to denounce violations against individuals’ rights (which, as can be seen, generates a much larger dataset than in the case of CSEM).

Overall, a very interesting talk worth discussing further.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , .


Why do I study water? The sheer size of the problem, that’s why.

I had lunch with my Dad two weekends ago (my Dad is a lawyer and he has taught law as well, so his background is also academic) and he started asking me why had I chosen the academic path that I have in the past few years. Dad seemed especially fascinated by my interest in wastewater. After all, I started my professional life even before I finished my undergraduate degree in chemical engineering, as a research assistant undertaking bench-scale experiments on aerobic wastewater treatment processes. I have been fascinated by pollution and solving contamination problems since I was very young. I always wanted to clean up our world.

Chefs Across The Water in Salt Spring Island

As time has gone by and I have matured as a scholar, I have searched for, and found ways to make my research more accessible to the general public. Beyond publishing in open-access journals and sharing tidbits of my research on my scholarly blog and on my social media outlets (being a public intellectual as much as I can), I also give talks that are intended for the average civilian. One of those talks, which I titled “Saving the world, one drop at a time” uses statistics (usually taken from the World Water Assessment Programme or from the UN-Water site, or from the WHO-UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme, although I just came across Water.org‘s very accessible site) to provide a snapshot of just the sheer size of the problem. Obviously, I admit that I do this to scare people into action.

The sheer size of the water and sanitation problem should scare us all. It is just bewildering to me how in some regions more people can have access to a mobile phone than access to a toilet. Over a billion people engage in open defecation. Even worse, according to the JMP (full 2012 report in PDF):

Open defecation rates have decreased from 25% in 1990 to 15% in 2010. Worldwide, 1.1 billion people practise open defecation, a decline of 271 million since 1990.

River overflow 5

Lack of water access and low levels of sanitation also have a negative impact on women and children.

In just one day, it is estimated that more than 152 million hours of women and girls’ time is consumed for the most basic of human needs — collecting water for domestic use

[Water.org}

Salt Spring Island and Chefs Across The Water

While my scholarship may not have the highest impact on how water is governed worldwide, at least I’m working towards bettering our understanding of water governance, in hopes that at least *some* communities can have access to improved water and sanitation. Even if I can improve the lives of a few people, at least my research has had *some* degree of impact.

Posted in academia, bridging academia and practice, water governance, water policy, water stress.