Skip to content


Towards interdisciplinarity: Recent book acquisitions by CIDE Region Centro’s library

One of the reasons that attracted me to CIDE Region Centro, and to take a professor position here, was the premise (and the promise) of a hub for interdisciplinary scholarship on regional studies. CIDE Region Centro has two main research programmes, the Programme on Drug Policy and the Programme on Regional Studies. I work mostly on the second one, although given how much environmental work we do, we might at some point open a Program in Environmental Studies. That still is yet to be seen, but I’m quite hopeful. I was trained in an environment that encouraged cross-fertilization and learning from other bodies of literature. My PhD itself is interdisciplinary, and my doctoral dissertation’s theoretical and analytical frameworks borrowed from chemical engineering, environmental politics, comparative public policy, anthropology and sociology, and economic geography.

I recently became CIDE Region Centro’s representative to the Library Acquisitions Committee of CIDE (the entire university), so I am now in charge of coordinating all library resources’ requests by faculty, staff and students. Two key tenets drive my approach to this new task. First, I want CIDE Region Centro’s library to be the best academic library in the central region of Mexico. Second, I want CIDE Region Centro’s book collection to showcase the interdisciplinary nature of our scholarly work. I think so far we’ve been doing great. Below you will find photographs of some of the most recent acquisitions we’ve brought to the library.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Yeah, our students won’t only do quantitative stuff, but they will also learn about ethnographic methods.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

And of course, it’s clear that I have an interest in having environmental politics books at CIDE Region Centro. Some of these are specific to my own field of research.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Slowly but surely, we are building the book collection at CIDE Region Centro (remember, the campus is only 2 years old!)

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

And of course, we have LOTS of books on water governance and water politics.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Posted in academia, research, research methods.

Tagged with , , , .


On working from home as an academic: Having the best possible setup for a home office

Given that I’ve been focusing this year on being disciplined and writing EVERY SINGLE DAY (something I had to stop doing for 2 weeks while JT was here visiting me from Vancouver), and that I write first thing in the morning (4:45am, for the most part, although when I sleep in I start working at 6:00am and writing, even on weekends), I knew that I needed to have the best possible setup as a home office. Having a well-designed home office increases my productivity and encourages me to write.

My home office in Aguascalientes

I have spent a small fortune in having my home office desk, bookshelves and accessories made-to-fit, but I figured I had to design an actuall, full-blown office at home. My house is 3 bedrooms, 2 stories and thus I knew that I would be assigning one of the bedrooms to my home office. I have set up high-speed wireless internet connection at home, and an all-in-one printer (which you can’t picture right now because I just bought it).

My home office in Aguascalientes

I also added a corkboard and a whiteboard, so that I could follow up with whatever writing or research commitments I have. In my home office, in a similar fashion but not quite like my office at CIDE, I have framed drawings that my nieces and nephews have created for me throughout the years, for motivation.

Overall, I’m quite proud of my home office. I recognize this kind of set up is unique as I am a single guy who lives in a 3 bedroom house and thus I have tonnes of space to arrange my life around, but I figured it might be of interest to anyone who reads my research blog.

My home office in Aguascalientes

Also, when I talked about discipline in writing earlier on my blog, I mentioned that I don’t leave my home office (nor my house) until I have written at least 30 minutes, and even better if I have managed to write for 2 hours (normally from 4:45am to 6:45am). I can then head to the university by 8:00am. My rule is never leave the house (and my home office) without having at least written for 30 minutes.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


National Teacher Appreciation Day 2013

Dr. Raul Pacheco-Vega giving a seminar/ teachingWhenever I think of my past and how it influenced my career choice of being a professor now, I always come back to my childhood. When I was 11, I read somewhere that the literacy rate in Mexico was in the 90%, but I never really believed it (obviously, these rates may vary geographically and at sub-national scales it may be much lower). I always wanted everyone to have a chance at a better life, and because both my parents were academics, teachers and professors, and in time, my older brothers also became teachers and professors, I figured the best way to help people was from the start: teaching them how to read and write. Literacy programs have always been near and dear to my heart.

So, at 11 years old, one good day I stopped by the National Institute for Adult Education (INEA) offices in my parents’ hometown and asked if I could join their literacy programs. I chose a gang-riddled area, not because I thought I was tough, but because I figured urban areas with gangs probably were the ones where the most illiterate people would be (what naivete in a young kid!) and that’s where I wanted to have the most impact.

I conducted literacy programs from when I was 11 to when I turned 16 years old and I still would love to continue doing it. I also tutored kids in math, science and writing. I figured that I had the teaching gene (my late Aunt also was a teacher) in my bloodstream, so I might as well continue on. And since I was 11 and to this day (even with a full year of teaching release), I’ve continued to teach. I am a born teacher. I was born to help people learn and realize their goals.

I’ve always been honored and humbled when my current and former students praise my approach to teaching, not because I’m self-absorbed, but because I absolutely, completely and entirely love teaching. Even when I’ve had teaching loads of 2-1-2, I’ve always loved doing it because I always get to see and hear from my former students and I am a witness to their growth and success. I’m passionate about teaching because as I have told my students, there is method to my madness: I can’t change the world as I am but one person. But I can imprint their minds and their hearts with a passion for improving the world around them, and THAT will enable me to change the world: creating hopeful, hard-working and brilliant men and women who will in turn, contribute their little grain of sand to the construction of a better society.

In Mexico we celebrate Teacher’s Day on May 15th, and worldwide World Teachers’ Day is October 5th. But today is National Teacher Appreciation Day and I salute my fellow educators. Happy National Teacher Appreciation Day! Hat tips to my dear friend Lisa Thomas-Tench who alerted me to this momentous occasion.

Posted in academia, teaching.

Tagged with .


A professor who sets the standard for social media (via The Ubyssey)

I was looking for media articles to update my Media page and I found this lovely snippet in the Last Words of February 13th, 2012 on The Ubyssey (The University of British Columbia’s campus-wide official student newspaper) on my approach to social media. I have to say that the best compliment I could ever hear is that my approach to teaching and engaging with my students is innovative. I love teaching, I always have and I always will, and my UBC students have a very, very special place in my heart. The excerpt below can be found here too.

A professor who sets the standard for social media

Although the communications staff in UBC’s various departments often use Twitter and Facebook to get their messages out, only a handful of its faculty really “get” social media.

That’s why it’s refreshing to see a professor who really engages with his students online in a way that isn’t superficial. And in that regard, Raul Pacheco-Vega—the subject of this week’s “Our Campus” profile—is at the head of the pack.

With over two thousand users following his research account and several thousand more on his personal feed, Pacheco-Vega is a minor celebrity by Twitter standards—and a large portion of those followers are his students. He uses the platform to post updates on his research, link to work opportunities in his field and give students real-time feedback on assignments. Through this unfettered interaction with students, Pacheco-Vega makes his work feel vibrant and alive, and it gives the political science department a sense of openness and innovation. Other professors should take note.

I’m truly honored, I really am.

Posted in academia, social media for teaching, teaching.

Tagged with , .


Notes from the field: Studying my own municipality’s solid waste and wastewater systems

I’ve been studying wastewater in Mexico for the better part of the last 20 years of my life. I have designed and built bench-scale effluent biological secondary and tertiary treatment systems and I have undertaken institutional ethnographic analyses of river basin organizations. I also have compared structures for sanitation governance across five states within the same river basin in central Mexico. In the past 5 years, I have branched out again to exploring the politics of solid waste and hazardous/toxic waste policy again.

MX074S11 World Bank

Mexican landfill. Photo credit: © Curt Carnemark / World Bank. Used with permission as per CC-license

Strangely enough, it’s only been until 2012 when I moved to Aguascalientes and started trying to understand its solid waste and wastewater governance systems that I paused to think about the implications of analyzing and studying my own municipality/region. Aguascalientes wasn’t my city (Vancouver, Canada was), but it is now. Beyond the fact that I am Mexican and that I had been based in a foreign country for the better part of the last 15 years studying Mexican environmental policy, I rarely gave it any thought. One of said foreign countries (I lived in Spain, England, France and the US too) soon became my own (Canada), and I also undertook comparative studies at the national and sub-national levels. And I’ve done comparative public policy for the better part of the past 15 years. But very rarely did I think about whether I was studying “my own backyard”. To me, living in a foreign country (Canada) while doing research on a country I knew very well (Mexico) seemed quite ok. But then again, in my comparative work I did analyze Canadian environmental policy too. The scale was what made me comfortable: I was analyzing entire countries rather than municipalities or provinces.

Doing interdisciplinary work means that often times I need to sit down and reflect on the methodological approach and theoretical stance I am taking in my analysis (as a mixed methods scholar, when I do qualitative research I always think of the importance of reflexivity as a research strategy). I’ve often criticized “parachuting” foreign scholars who argue they know Mexico and Mexican politics better than, say, Mexican scholars. But now I wonder whether I’m doing a bit of “parachuting” myself and how much fieldwork in the city of Aguascalientes (e.g. how extensive, how in-depth) should I undertake before I consider that I am specialized enough and that I understand the city and its political and policy structures well enough.

I read someone’s CV recently where the scholar in question indicated a list of countries where he/she had undertaken fieldwork. The list included more than 30 countries, which for the age of said scholar, made me question how long had his/her fieldwork been. I’ve done fieldwork in the US, Canada, Great Britain, Spain and Mexico, and to this day, the only countries where I feel I’m most comfortable mentioning/doing empirical work are the North American ones (Canada, US, Mexico).

I guess I am just wary of now being judged as a “parachuting” scholar who landed in Aguascalientes and is now studying its wastewater and solid waste management systems rather than an academic who is just beginning fieldwork in this specific region (as I have been fully immersed in the city for less than a year). I’d appreciate feedback from all scholars, but particularly those of you who do fieldwork and who do empirical work (interviews, participant observation, etc.) on the qualitative side of things. I think anthropologists, sociologists and geographers especially may have input to provide.

Posted in academia, research, research methods.

Tagged with , .


My Top 10 academic productivity tips, or how I submitted 5 pieces in 3 weeks

In the past 3 weeks, I have submitted a total of 2 journal manuscripts (two in Spanish, one in English), 1 conference paper (in English), 1 book chapter (in Spanish) and one co-authored grant proposal (in English). In addition, I have about 8 manuscripts at various stages of development (for the most part, almost completed). You may think that this is bragging (or pure insanity, depending on your viewpoint). The reality is that this is about what I expected.

Ostrom research

I have been writing every day for at least 2 hours (although I have calculated that in the past 2 weeks I’ve clocked about 60 hours of writing). The first thing I do when I wake up is make a pot of coffee, make my bed, start my computer and begin writing (you can read my Top 10 Tips for Academic Writing here). But being productive and having done the research and only writing it up is not enough. I needed to start feeling like I was achieving something.

So I began submitting the manuscripts. Not only did I write, but I let them go off my desk. It helps when you have deadlines, be it self-imposed or externally requested. I still have one book chapter (in English) and two journal article manuscripts (one in English, one in Spanish) that I need to polish and send off, on top of two book reviews. But seeing my production on Friday evening, mapping out in a document my output and research trajectory and clearing up my desk made me feel incredibly happy.

So, how did I manage to submit 4 manuscripts and a grant proposal in two different languages in less than a month? There are a number of factors that have increased my productivity manyfold.

1. Writing every day. No day goes by (including Saturdays and Sundays) when I don’t write at least for 2 hours solid, even if it is in 4 chunks of 30 minutes each.

My method of doing scholarly research

2. Full teaching release. I know, I’m lucky that way. I am not teaching 2012-2013 (although that’s going to stop in the fall and I’m probably getting a 1-2 or 2-2 teaching load, which probably will hinder my productivity).

3. A small army of research assistants. I have 6 research assistants in Mexico, each of whom is working with me on a different project. In addition, I have 4 research students in Canada and 1 in the United States, all of whom are co-authoring research papers with me. Thus, I am getting a lot of help. While I work on one manuscript with the dataset that one of my RAs assembles, the rest are working on something different. I have a very strong work ethic with my research assistants (you can read my philosophy of working with RAs here).

4. Working in parallel on several projects at the time. This is something that may sound weird to other academics, but I actually find it intellectually stimulating to work in parallel. Write bits of one piece here, bits of another piece there. Of course, as each piece nears completion (and some are completed faster than others), I focus more on that one so that it leaves my desk (or computer, as it may be).

My research output in the past couple of months

5. Submit, submit, submit. The reality is, we are all our worst critics. Every time I read one of my manuscripts, I think that there is something that needs to be improved. So I have learned, through time, to make sure that I don’t submit shoddy work, but I also try to strike a delicate balance with keeping manuscripts in the back burner. I prefer to get them out, get feedback (rejected, revise-and-resubmit, or if I’m lucky, accepted) than keeping them in my computer’s hard drive. I also keep track of which projects I am working on in my office’s whiteboard, and I check-mark those that I have already submitted. By visually keeping track of where I am at, and what I have accomplished, I can sense my own progress.

My method of doing scholarly research

6. Create the best office environment to work. I have set up a home office both at my parents’ place and at my house in Aguascalientes. I have strong wifi, a printer in each one of them, printer, book/paper holder, corkboard and whiteboard, solid office chairs and a sturdy desk, as well as a small fortune in stationery and office supplies. Because I work first thing in the morning, and sometimes at night, I always ensure I have the best setup for working at home. The same occurs at my office at the university. Every so often I will clear up my desk and rearrange my organizing system so that I can have a clear office and desk. Cluttered workspace, cluttered mind or so they say.

My office desk (clean and spotless after clearing up my to-do list)

7. Be organized and disciplined. This is perhaps the biggest challenge I face. You can see my office when it’s perfectly organized, but every few weeks/a month I reorganize my office space and my list of priorities. Writing is always the top one.

How I write an academic paper

8. Learn to say NO. This was something that made me really proud. I did miss several international conferences I was scheduled to present at (and I had already even written the papers), but others I actually said no to. Two of them were in fact complicating my life so much that I was supposed to be in Los Angeles on a Thursday, Denver on a Friday and Chicago on a Saturday. I also said NO to a conference in Vancouver (Canada) when I would have had to be in Tokyo (Japan). The logistics would have been impossible in both cases.

9. Don’t get discouraged and keep going. This week I also received 2 rejections (one, a journal article that I actually thought was a slam-dunk, and a grant proposal I also thought was a done deal). Instead of pouting, I’ve been focusing on completing other pieces and submitting additional grant proposals. I can’t let small setbacks create big obstacles. I also rewarded myself by giving myself permission to pout and be angry. And then I began working on another grant proposal.

10. Reward yourself after completing pieces. This is a piece of advice I received from my friend Jo VanEvery, who emphasizes that you should acknowledge what you’ve accomplished (Jo also happens to be an academic coach). I reward myself when I complete a piece of writing. Be it having dinner at my house and a glass of wine, or heading downtown Aguascalientes and having the best tamales in the entire world, or visiting my parents at their hometown and going for brunch with them, or having chocolate, I give myself a reward which also works as an incentive to keep writing.

I’m well aware that my productivity tips are (some of them, at least) very specific to my personal circumstances. Not everyone can have a small army of research assistants, or full teaching release. But I think the overall gist of my post can be applied to anyone. If you set aside 2 hours of writing (as my other guru, Tanya Golash-Boza indicates on her blog) every single day, you can accomplish a lot. Heck you can accomplish a lot in 30 minute increments (as Aimee Morrison suggests)!

Hopefully my advice is helpful to fellow academic writers. I actually wrote it for myself, but it doesn’t hurt to share it with the world. This post also helps me reflect on my own habits and behaviour and correct them when they’re not working well.

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , .


Dr. Kathy Baylis on forest conservation policies in Mexico at CIDE Region Centro

As part of the Regional Studies programme at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes, last week we had Dr. Kathy Baylis (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) give an invited seminar on forest conservation policies in central Mexico. Kathy and I knew each other from our previous positions (we both were faculty members at The University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, Kathy in the faculty of Land and Food Systems and I in the faculty of Arts, in the Department of Political Science), so it was great to get an opportunity to see each other again and catch up.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

While I’m a fan of spatial econometrics (no secret to anyone who knows me), I think what I enjoyed the most about Kathy’s seminar was her instructional approach to explaining the research she is currently undertaking with colleagues in the US and Mexico. We had a lot of students and research assistants in the audience, and I think they all benefited from Kathy explaining things to a very easy-to-digest level. Kathy and her colleagues’ paper explored a patchwork of conservation policies in the Monarch butterfly habitat in Michoacan. I’m well aware of how this area has been (unfortunately) a forested area that is sometimes mismanaged.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

In the paper she presented Kathy and her colleagues investigated the effect of management, logging bans and protected area regulations. As I argued in her talk, one of the biggest challenges Kathy and her colleagues will encounter will be finding ways to create indicators of good resource governance (something I’ve been working on for the past few years, albeit in the water field).

I was also really proud to showcase how our university campus can handle interactions via videoconferencing , as we had several seminar participants from the main campus of CIDE in Santa Fe (Mexico City). Frankly, the more international seminars we organize, the prouder I feel of being at CIDE Region Centro in Aguascalientes. We have the human capital and the technology to disseminate our scholarship widely, and this does make me proud.

Dr. Kathy Baylis seminar at CIDE Region Centro

I look forward to continuing these conversations with Kathy and my fellow CIDE colleagues, as I think that policy evaluation is one of the least researched areas of public policy analysis, and one I have maintained an interest in and worked for many years. Moreover, I really enjoyed how a multidisciplinary perspective provided Kathy with a very different view of what her paper would contribute if she had only presented to a purely-economics audience. I think the benefits of interdisciplinarity speak for themselves.

Posted in academia, policy analysis, policy instruments, research, research methods.

Tagged with , , , .


Making time to read and reflect: Writing a literature review

Home office at my parentsWhile I would like to say that I’m able to stretch the 24 hours in a day to fit in time to read EVERY DAY (which is one of the pieces of advice I don’t think I could ever give, much as I’d love to do it myself), I do try to make time to fit some reading every day. This is hard because, like any professor, I have to deal with meetings, answering emails, reviewing books and journal manuscripts, doing my own academic writing, and every other thing that comes up. As Melonie Fullick aptly puts it, it’s harder and harder to find time for deep reflection.

Research books 001Most people who read my research blog will know that the time I use for deep reflection, thinking and writing is the wee hours of the morning. I wake up at 4:45am every single morning and the first two hours of the day I do nothing but research. Specifically, I write (and I write EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK, 7 DAYS A WEEK). To aid me in my relentless pursuit of “a time to read”, I have implemented 2 strategies that have worked wonders:

My research workflow and planning processFirst, I commit to writing a full paper. That is, I don’t attend a conference unless I am writing a full paper that I then will upgrade with the commentary and critique I receive and submit to a peer-reviewed journal. I have now built a workflow and process where I write my priorities as a list and then I note besides them a “check mark” when they’ve been completed. I also wrote the mantra “submit, submit, submit” to motivate me to NOT keep a paper with me for long, but just submit it for peer-review.

My research workflow and note-takingSecond, I write a literature review for each paper. This means that I go back to the graduate school method of highlighting journal articles with pens, writing notes about the literature by hand, on paper. Of course, I also use Evernote to clip relevant research tidbits and articles, and I annotate PDFs on Mendeley. And I have a modified method of computerized note-taking that vaguely resembles the Cornell Notes method (though mine is much more thorough).

Writing a literature review for each paper I publish forces me to go back to the body of scholarship, and to budget enough time to read whatever works I have visualized including in my paper. Knowing that I have 25 papers on a specific topic to read, summarize them, write notes on each, makes me be way more efficient about how I use my time (and often forces me to block even more time to just read).

Finding the time to think deeply and reflect (one of the tenets of academic life) is not a problem only for academics. Other busy folks find creative ways to think and reflect (read here, and here for but two examples).

I also find that getting away from the city where my university is located every weekend (I visit my parents in their hometown) also gives me time to think and reflect. Since many times I bus instead of driving down, I use those two hours to read and reflect on what scholarship I’m working on.

Finally, another way in which I have found time to reflect and think is by going on long walks with friends, be them academics or otherwise. By verbalizing what I am working on, I am forced to think deeply about the direction in which my research is going.

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , .


Transboundary water governance: Many questions, not so many answers

I have been studying transboundary water governance for a few years now, and one of the things that strikes me the most is that we still have many more questions on how to build strong and resilient institutions to govern water bodies that cross nation-state boundaries than we do have answers. For example, in the Northern part of Mexico, the US-Mexico border faces many environmental challenges, water being one of the most important ones. The US-Mexico 1944 treaty was supposed to establish cross-national institutions to govern how water was distributed across the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo basin.

river flow

However, there is still much source of conflict in transboundary water resource sharing. The West Bank area shares water bodies and there is still enormous conflict there. Many countries share transboundary water bodies. As the UN Water website indicates:

There are 276 transboundary river basins in the world (64 transboundary river basins in Africa, 60 in Asia, 68 in Europe, 46 in North America and 38 in South America). 185 out of the 276 transboundary river basins, about two-thirds, are shared by two countries. 256 out of 276 are shared by 2, 3 or 4 countries (92,7%), and 20 out of 276 are shared by 5 or more countries (7,2%), the maximum being 18 countries sharing a same transboundary river basin (Danube). 46% of the globe’s (terrestrial) surface is covered by transboundary river basins. 148 countries include territory within one or more transboundary river basins. 39 countries have more than 90% of their territory within one or more transboundary river basins, and 21 lie entirely within one or more of these watersheds. The Russian Federation shares 30 transboundary river basins with riparian countries, Chile and United States 19, Argentina and China 18, Canada 15, Guinea 14, Guatemala 13, and France 10.

2013 marks the Year of International Water Cooperation, and much as it is the trademark of the UN Water year, I’m not certain we know the proper mechanisms for transboundary water cooperation.

I recently participated in an international experts workshop on transboundary water governance and climatic change. At the workshop I presented preliminary work of mine where I compare how US-Canada and US-Mexico water governance initiatives are adapting to climatic change, and whether there is some explanation for the ways in which cross-border collaboration occurs.

Seminario Internacional Agua y Fronteras Frente al Cambio Climatico (COLEF-CIESAS Monterrey 2012)

I have also done other work on transboundary water governance. With Emelie Peacock, I have examined how well does a cooperation-conflict continuum tool (the Transboundary Water Interactions Nexus tool, TWINS) apply in a global environmental politics classroom setting. We also examined how useful TWINS was to analyze cross-border collaborative initiatives for transboundary water governance.

What I have learned in my research so far is that transboundary water governance requires robust cross-national collaboration that is then enshrined in strong international institutions. But we are still way too far to say that we have the answers that the world requires. There’s still much work to do!

Posted in water governance, World Water Day.

Tagged with , , .


On the divergence of water cooperation and water conflict bodies of scholarship

For the past couple of decades, I have been a scholar of cooperative behavior. I have studied how cooperation among agents occurs, within a broad variety of contexts. I have demonstrated that environmental activists build strategic relationships and form transnational coalitions to put pressure on nation states (Pacheco-Vega 2005a, b, Pacheco-Vega, Weibust and Fox 2010). I have also shown how lack of cooperation among state, federal and municipal governments hinders wastewater governance and limits the effectiveness of state-wide and basin-wide sanitation policies (Pacheco-Vega 2011, 2012, forthcoming). I have also shown how cities where clusters emerge naturally are more resilient to external shocks than cities that host “forced” industrial districts (Pacheco-Vega 2008, Pacheco and Dowlatabadi 2003, 2005, 2007, Pacheco-Vega forthcoming). I have become known for being a scholar of cooperation.

OECD Policy Dialogue on Water in Mexico

This year, by happen stance (I was researching a few Mexican cities’ urban water systems for a couple of comparative papers I’m presenting at Association of American Geographers and at Association of Borderland Studies) and began to find literature on water conflict. The strangest thing is that I have come to find that the bodies of literature are very, very different. As I mentioned on Twitter:

For example, if you want to learn how individuals self-organize to govern water as a common pool resource you need nothing more than look at the Elinor Ostrom (and collaborators’) bodies of work. Cooperation occurs when there are clear resource-sharing rules, among a number of other factors. However, if you want to understand conflict and design mechanisms to solve said conflict, you can look at the work of Larry Susskind, Barbara Gray, Heidi and Guy Burgess.

I’m fascinated by this apparent divergence, particularly because as I said, I have always seen myself as someone who seeks to understand patterns of cooperative behavior. One would think that just “flipping the coin on knowledge” would enable us to understand mechanisms of conflict resolution in disputes for water resources. But it doesn’t work in that exact way. 2013 will be a watershed year (yes, pun intended) for me, as it will be the year when I delve more into water conflict, more specifically intractable water conflict (e.g. conflicts that reach stalemates, are prolonged and appear seemingly non-solvable).

Chefs Across The Water in Salt Spring Island

I am currently working on a book project proposal on this very topic (following the work of Lewicki, Gray and Elliott), and specifically examining empirical case studies within Mexico. If you are thinking of working in this area for your Masters/PhD, feel free to contact me. I have already undertaken a substantive literature review and have submitted a book chapter and a journal manuscript on the topic for peer review.

Posted in water governance, water policy, World Water Day.

Tagged with , , , .