Skip to content


My experience at #IASC2013 International Association for the Study of the Commons Conference in Kitafuji, Japan

Complex commons and water governance in Mexico IASC 2013I give a lot of talks and present a lot of my work at conferences, both nationally and internationally. But this 2013, for a number of circumstances (mostly, personal and some logistical), I hadn’t been able to present my papers at the conferences I had already scheduled. So being able to present at the Latin American Studies Association conference in Washington DC in the US and the International Association for the Study of the Commons conference in Kitafuji in Japan gave me two solid weeks of fully-immersed scholarly reflection (you can read on what I talked about at IASC 2013 here). And the picture below reflects exactly how I feel (as found on the When In Academia Tumblr):

Conferences

I do think that was totally wicked. LASA 2013 was fantastic in that I was again surrounded by Latin American Studies scholars, in that I met a lot of academics I wanted to meet in person that I had talked to and followed on Twitter, and that I rekindled my friendships after many years of not seeing some of my scholarly friends.

But it was at IASC 2013 that I felt reborn and my internal academic fire re-ignited. You’ll see, if you have read my academic and research blog, you’ll know that I didn’t manage to solve the two-body problem, and that after 8 years, I experienced a really big loss.

New theoretical and empirical directions in commons research - IASC 2013However, participating in LASA, and more importantly, being at IASC surrounded by academics who care about me on a personal level, and who believe in my research and my potential to contribute to scholarship on the commons really healed me, on a personal level, and pushed me continue working to further our understanding of how neoinstitutional theory can be applied to understand problems of what Charlotte Hess calls “negative commons”, e.g. – wastewater.

New theoretical and empirical directions in commons research - IASC 2013

Mishima (water and river restoration fieldwork for IASC 2013)

Me with Dr. Leticia Merino, President of IASC and Professor at the Institute for Social Research, UNAM

The truth is that academic conferences, despite the expense, and in spite of how much distance sometimes one needs to travel, are incredible vehicles not only to get feedback on your research projects, but also to network and build new scholarly collaborations (as well as friendships). I am eternally grateful to IASC (the organization), Professor Merino and Dr. Meg McKean (co-organizer of IASC 2013), because I feel much more motivated to continue applying what I learned from Elinor Ostrom and Vincent Ostrom to tackle intractable resource problems after participating in IASC 2013.

Closing Ceremony IASC 2013

Dr. Fikret Berkes (University of Manitoba) and Dr. Leticia Merino (UNAM)

I also volunteered to help organize IASC 2015 in Edmonton, Alberta, in my adoptive country of Canada. Hopefully I will get to see many of you there.

Posted in academia, conferences, research.

Tagged with , , .


Dr. Dusan Paredes on spatial income inequality in Chile at CIDE Region Centro

We recently hosted Dr. Dusan Paredes (Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile) at CIDE Region Centro, in the context of the Regional Indicators project that CIDE Region Centro’s Regional Studies Research Group is currently engaged in (an INEGI-CONACYT funded project).

Dr. Dusan Paredes (Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile) at CIDE Region Centro

It’s hard for me to participate in a seminar on spatial econometrics, and the intersection of economic geography (a la Hayter or McLachlan) and geographical economics (a la Krugman), and not be super excited. After all, my PhD dissertation was precisely on spatial agglomeration, industrial clusters and environmental regulation. While I do mostly water governance and solid waste management (within the framework of comparative environmental policy in North America), I can’t help but be still in love with economic geography and spatial analysis.

Dusan’s paper (Desigualdad espacial de ingresos en Chile y su relación con la concentración de capital humano avanzado, Spatial income inequality in Chile and its relationship with advanced human capital concentration) was presented in Spanish, which facilitated the discussion as we had several folks from INEGI (the National Institute of Geography and Statistics of Mexico, which is located in Aguascalientes) visiting us and attending Dusan’s seminar.

The spatial income inequality in Latin American countries is a recent academic affair. Particularly, the case of Chile highlights around the world because it has one of the highest individual and spatial inequality rates. This article analyzes the spatial income inequality in Chile during 1992 2011 evaluating the role of the spatial labor sorting through multilevel models. The findings show that human capital doesn’t allocate randomly across the space but its spatial concentration at the biggest urban centers impacts significantly the income inequality between counties. These findings motivate the discussion about spatial dimension of the inequality and suggest that policymakers should consider ways to spread human capital throughout the nation as an alternative to reduce spatial inequality.

What I found most interesting of Dusan’s paper is how in many ways his work sheds light on what many of us have read of Richard Florida‘s early work on the creative class (yes, THAT Richard Florida. Say what you will, but Florida has done some very solid academic work). I think Latin America’s cities have been under-researched when it comes to the creative economy and the effect of highly specialized human capital on urban development and growth. Dusan’s research also touches on a topic that is relevant to the discussion: income inequality, which is also affected by (and affects) space and location as variables.

Dr. Dusan Paredes (Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile) at CIDE Region Centro

Dr. Dusan Paredes (Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile) at CIDE Region Centro

What I remarked toward the end of Dusan’s seminar was that in fact, much of what he said was economic geography rather than geographical economics. He highlighted the fact that we need to bring the spatial variable back. This is something I’ve argued for almost a decade in my own research. Even political science is realizing this aspect (see Regional Studies’ special issue)! And next year’s International Studies Association conference has the theme of space and location.

Dr. Dusan Paredes (Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile) at CIDE Region Centro

This has been a stellar year for CIDE Region Centro in regards to internationalization, as we’ve had a fantastic string of invited speakers. Previous talks in our seminar series this Spring 2013 have included Dr. Kathy Baylis (UIUC, USA) and Dr. Kathy Harrison (UBC, Canada). Thanks Dusan for an informative talk!

Posted in academia, research.

Tagged with , , , , .


My panels at IASC 2013: New methods for commons research and Water governance in Mexico

I am chairing and organizing two panels at the 14th Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASC), held 3-7 June 2013 in Kitafuji, Japan. The first one is New Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Commons Research and the second one is Complex Commons and Water Governance in Mexico. You can check the conference program for Friday (today) here.

In both panels, I will be presenting some of my research in progress. I am particularly excited about my two papers, whose abstracts I include here.

Neoinstitutionalism, IAD and polycentric governance of the commons: toward a research agenda on water governance in Mexico

One of Elinor Ostrom’s biggest contributions to scholarly research was broadening our understanding of water as a commons, and of the potential of self-organizing groups to create incentives for collective action that would yield sustainable water management. Firmly rooted in neoinstitutionalist theories, Ostrom and her group developed the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework , which has been applied in a wide variety of settings to assess . Vincent Ostrom built the foundational roots where polycentricity and polycentric governance are set. In this paper, I undertake a historical overview of the joint contributions of the Ostroms to commons governance in Mexico, narrowing my analysis to water. My aim with the paper is to trace the development of applications of neoinstitutional theory, IAD and polycentric governance to Mexican water policy in the past 30 years. In the paper, I discuss some of my own work applying these theoretical frameworks to analyzing the governance of wastewater in Mexico, and I propose a research agenda that both furthers the Ostroms’ legacy and extends our understanding of water governance in Mexico.

and

Understanding the dynamics of institutional erosion in wastewater governance processes through a case study of the Lerma-Chapala river basin council in Mexico

2.9 billion people worldwide do not have access to a toilet (George 2010). 894 million people lack access to safe water (World Water Assessment Project 2011). 2.6 billion people live without proper sanitation and 1.1 billion still defecate in the open (Joint Monitoring Programme 2012). Governing wastewater necessitates a holistic, integrated view of integrated water management that encompasses the entire hydrological cycle and not only the components that are most visible to engineers and public health professionals. Governing wastewater in Mexico (and worldwide) still remains a large policy challenge.

This paper focuses the discussion on the dynamics of institutional erosion within Mexican water management and how institutional arrangements for wastewater governance have been slowly fractured and weakened through improper design of rules and norms within the river basin councils (Consejos de Cuenca in Spanish) and the river basin organizations (Organismos de Cuenca in Spanish). The paper uses empirical data from wastewater policies in 5 Mexican states (all of which have territory within the Lerma-Chapala river basin), but I argue that the analysis could very well apply to surface and groundwater management. In this paper I analyze the dynamics of institutional erosion within river basin councils after the legal reforms to the Mexican Water Law of 2004. My research has found that the efficiency and efficacy of river basin councils is very much dependent on design elements, political structures, institutional dynamics, extent of institutional erosion, emergence and robustness of formal and informal social norms and other contextual factors. Using lessons drawn from the Lerma-Chapala river basin as a case study, I challenge the validity of the watershed council as a paradigmatic model of institutional reform for water governance, and propose a preliminary set of ways in which we may want to reformulate this paradigm.

Wish me luck! If you are interested in these papers email me and I will make sure to send you a copy.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , .


Day 2 of the International Association for the Study of the Commons 2013 Conference

The second day of IASC 2013 (the 14th Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, IASC, held 3-7 June 2013 in Kitafuji, Japan) was, much like the first day, filled with an incredibly intense package of presentations (you can check the panel schedule details for Wednesday here). I was really disappointed to miss the Ostrom Awards, but I got food poisoning (and probably a combination of jet-lag) in the afternoon. That said, I did attend a couple of really nice panels.

First, I checked out a panel on urban commons and open spaces, where Elizabeth Brabec (University of Massachussets – Amherst) gave a nice paper on open spaces in Vancouver (the city where I lived for 16 years). The paper is entitled “Common Space in the City of Vancouver: Analyzing Process and Outcomes“. Of course, this was an interesting and important paper to check out, so that’s why I was really keen to see what Elizabeth had done. I really liked her talk but I was surprised to see her NOT talk about greed of real estate developers as a driving force of changes in open spaces in Vancouver.

IASC 2013 Day 2 Sessions

In the early afternoon I checked out a panel on field experiments in water commons research. I’m really keen to get back into experimental research (field experiments are interesting as methodological tools for water governance because they allow you to go into the field and test potential hypotheses with real folks and to study their behaviors in situ). The use of field experiments in studying water is increasing (check these examples – here and here)

IASC 2013 Day 2 Sessions

Overall, I really enjoyed the second day, and I’m sorry I missed the Ostrom Awards (particularly because I am a member of the judging committee!). Here is a photo of Dr. Merino giving one of the Ostrom Awards recognition certificates.

Open Spaces Society campaigner Kate receiving Ostrom award 2013 from Dr Leticia Merino (photo credit: Countryside and Community Research Institute, CCRI UK)

Photo credit: Countryside and Community Research Institute, CCRI UK

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


International Association for the Study of the Commons 2013 in Kitafuji, Japan

I’m at the International Association for the Study of the Commons Biennial Meeting where I will be speaking on Friday in two panels that I organized. One of the panels is on Water Governance in Mexico, and the other is on New Theoretical and Empirical Methods to Study Commons. It is in these panels where I’ll be discussing my work on polycentric water governance in Mexico . This 2013 it is hosted in Kitafuji, Japan (in Fujiyoshida City, near Mount Fuji.

IASC 2013I’m really excited not only because I am really good friends with many of the worldwide’s best scholars who study commons, but also because I get to see them in the flesh, and talk about our research. For example, on this photo (not my best photo, I might add), you can see Dr. Leticia Merino (President of the IASC and a full professor at the Institute for Social Research at UNAM in Mexico), and Dr. Natalie Ban (Assistant Professor, University of Victoria in Mexico). Both of them are very close friends of mine.

As it so happens, Leticia has been a mentor to me for many years, and Natalie did her PhD in the same program as I did. I also have been able to meet up with other friends and colleagues from other countries who do scholarly research on the commons as I do, and people with whom I have corresponded but had not met in advance. I have to praise the organizing committee as the conference has been so far, operating seamlessly.

International Association for the Study of the Commons (Kitafuji, Japan)

What I have found so far is that the range of topics is incredibly vast. I’ve not had a chance to check the anti-commons and negative commons sessions, which I think are rather important. But I had a chance to listen to Dr. Bonnie McCay, someone whose research I respect quite a lot, give a solid keynote on tragedies and comedies of the commons. You can check Bonnie’s talk here (courtesy of the IASC’s YouTube):

Overall, I am quite impressed with the organization of the conference (with VERY reliable wifi!), and an incredibly exciting set of research streams in the conference program. Kudos to the organizers, volunteers and participants in IASC 2013. You can check the Twitter stream searching the hashtag #IASC2013, check out my Flickr photo sets for IASC 2013 here).

IASC 2013 Panels 1, 2 and lunch poster sessions

The only thing I wish that had happened here was that more of my academic colleagues tweeted about the conference!

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , , , .


Working on weekends as a norm in academic life

The reality is that I’ve always been a little bit of a workaholic, but I had felt that I had achieved some sense of balance at least in the last 3-5 years. I was exercising every single day, hanging out at least with one different (if not more) friend(s) every day, spending quality time JT at least once a week as well as taking some time to meditate. I was playing volleyball once a week, and in all that, I was still teaching, doing research, and taking on a bit of consulting work.

When I moved back from Canada to Mexico, I did lose a little bit of that balance. I do need more exercise, that’s for sure (and I’m working on getting that fixed), and to do more social stuff (as no successful academic I know lives only to work, write, teach and publish). I do see my best friend and his wife once a week (they live in Aguascalientes too), and I spend weekends with my parents in Leon (so, 3 nights out of 7 I am at my parental units city).

My method of doing scholarly research

Still, because I have a home office at my Mom’s house, I can easily resort to answering emails, working on draft manuscripts or read scholarly stuff. And if I am honest with myself, I do bring work with me on weekends (though I try not to spend too much of the weekend on work, as I recognize that I need to recharge my batteries and being close to my parents as they age is the main reason why I left Canada and moved back to Mexico, so spending quality time with them is important to me).

247/366: overwork

Photo credit: David Flores on Flickr

I recently asked a question to my Twitter followers whether they felt external pressure (e.g. explicitly telling you “we need this manuscript by Monday morning” or to have to submit grades, something to that end) or internal (e.g. “I want to finish this and get it over with”). Here is a Storify summary of their responses, with my own commentary.

I am writing this post on a Sunday night, which is a bit ironic, given that I just said that I didn’t feel any external pressure to work weekends, but since academic blogging is something I don’t do during the week, as a norm, I had to finish it today!

overworked

Photo credit: Venet Osmani on Flickr

The truth is, almost every academic I know (perhaps with the exception of Tanya Golash-Boza) works weekends. Most do on occasion, a few hours, or just one of the 2 days, but at least some time is put into work. In my case, I have found that whenever I take breaks, I write faster, more concise prose, and I am much more refreshed. I also get better ideas when I’m not overworked.

If I may summarize what I learned from asking the question “do you feel external pressure to work weekends?” the vast majority of academics will say “yes, in one way or another”, but it was rewarding to read that even with working weekends, a large majority really enjoy what they do. I certainly do. I work weekends not only because I don’t have the pressure of a family (I’m single now), and I have a thriving research agenda, not because I have external pressures. I am very lucky, and I do recognize those who aren’t as lucky as I am.

Posted in academia.


Call for Papers International Studies Association 2014: Space, scale and geopolitics in the global governance of waste

We are inviting proposals for papers for the following panel:

Space, scale and geopolitics in the global governance of waste

Panel proposal for the 2014 International Studies Association conference: Spaces and Places: Geopolitics in an Era of Globalization, Toronto (ON), Canada.

Panel co-convenors:

Dr. Kate O’Neill (Associate Professor, University of California, Berkeley, USA) kmoneill[@]berkeley[.]edu

Dr. Raul Pacheco-Vega (Assistant Professor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, CIDE, Mexico) raul.pacheco-vega[@]cide[.]edu

Governing waste is a complex activity given the transnational, cross-scalar and uneven dimensions of waste production, transportation, recycling and ultimately, disposal. It is an issue characterized by complex politics, and many different sorts of actors. Wastewater generated in a US chemical plant located upstream of a small village in Mexico could very well impact negatively the livelihoods of vulnerable communities downstream. International flows of electronic waste have increased in recent years, and e-waste has become a global concern for policy-makers and environmental activists. Across nations of similar states of economic development, informal recyclers (waste pickers) have very different livelihoods and behavioral patterns, and face myriad challenges of different natures.

In this panel, we seek to explore patterns of global governance of waste, broadly defined. Papers could discuss elements of the issue – for example, spatial patterns of e-waste trading, the transnational dimensions of solid waste management, and/or emergence of informal recycling and related social movements. They could also discuss elements of global/transnational waste governance – for example, recent politics in the Basel Convention on hazardous waste trading or the global politics of sanitation and wastewater governance. We are keen on exploring a diverse array of dimensions of issue (solid waste, hazardous waste, electronic waste and/or wastewater, for example), governance models (multilevel, polycentric) and scales (cross-national comparative studies at the sub-national scales are of interest). We are interested primarily in empirical papers that explore case studies of waste, wastewater and waste governance through the lenses of scale, space and politics. We are also interested in theoretical papers that frame a multidisciplinary conversation bridging geography, political science and international relations theories. Finally, we seek comparative and globally-focused papers that would enable us to create more generalizable and testable hypotheses on how waste is governed globally and whether we can ascertain specific policy pathways for a more sustainable society.

Paper proposals should be 250 words or less and should be submitted to Dr. Kate O’Neill (kmoneill[@]berkeley[.]edu) and Dr. Raul Pacheco-Vega (raul[.]pacheco[-]vega[@]cide[.]edu) by May 25th, 2013 at 4pm PST. Please include paper author affiliation, contact details, and 3 keywords in your abstract submission.

____________________________

Posted in academia, geography, governance, research.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Realities of academia: On the two-body problem, emotional states and research/career advancement

Earlier this week, I tweeted something that I think is often forgotten: we academics are humans who do research, not robots. Thus, our careers’ advancement and research progress are often hindered by our emotional states.

I mention the negative impact of emotions rather than the positive, although it is true that emotional well-being has a positive impact on research. In my case, being close now to my parents (who live in Mexico) has in fact improved my ability to focus on my research. When I lived abroad, I was often worried about their well-being and now that I live in Mexico too, it is much easier for me to focus and be less preoccupied.

The reality of academic life is that very often, personal relationships will suffer (read this post by the spouse of an academic for but one example) For privacy reasons, I will not to delve into my own personal situation, but let’s just say that I played the “let’s try to solve the two-body problem” game, and I lost (as recently as two weeks ago). Very few people know the inner details of what happened, but I will just indicate that this is the second time I have tried to solve the two-body problem, and the second time I failed. One was as a young, promising PhD candidate, and the second one, as an early-career scholar.

No amount of advice prepares you for this moment. But at least *some* universities have taken to publicly acknowledge the challenges of dual careers and provide *some* advice (read here and here). And at least, there has been *some* discussion (read a Storify here) online.

In my case, the distance is huge (from Canada to Mexico), and the financial challenges are pretty big (no matter how often you want to fly back-and-forth, it gets incredibly expensive and relationships take a big emotional toll). That’s the part that I think is often left outside of *any* discussion on academic life. The reality is, we (and by we I mean, PhD students, early career scholars, and even senior professors) very well could be heartbroken (due to relationship breakups, family or friends’ deaths or illnesses), and yet we seem to be expected to “just tough it out” and survive (and continue thriving in academia, publishing, teaching and doing research). Little is being written about how to deal with emotions in academic life, even as we often face emotional fatigue.

The truth is, everyone around me has been amazingly supportive during this difficult time, particularly my fellow professors at CIDE, and of course my friends and family. Even my own students have reached out to lend an ear. Having a strong network of support is key to success in any kind of life, and academia requires a very robust team of people who will want to help. My former PhD advisor was fantastic in this regard, not only with me but with every single one of his PhD students, and I hope my own students know that they can always reach out to me if they are in emotional pain that could potentially hinder their research progress.

I can’t speak for anybody else, but I have always taken into account my students’ (and colleagues’) emotional state when discussing research. My co-authors and co-principal-investigators have been amazing and asked if I would like to take some time off or offer to take the lead in a project. The truth is, life goes on, and mine will go on as well. I have a thriving research agenda and am looking forward to a bright future. But I am also human and I know that there might be times when I’ll feel awful, and sad. And the great thing is – I know I will have folks to count on when this happens. Folks who want me to succeed in academia and in life. And that’s a great relief.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with .


On the evolution of my thinking and research trajectory

A month or so ago, I began writing a document that mapped my writing output and my research trajectory. More than the research trajectory that other writers and myself have referred to at some points (i.e., the roadmap of what research output you need by when in order to achieve tenure, a-la-Karen Kelsky), the document I’m writing maps what I have written and researched in the past 5 years (2008-2013). It’s kind of an REF report and a research trajectory altogether. The report is a narrative account of my scholarly output and my research plans towards the future.

Lynn Canyon

This document (my research trajectory and output file) is important to me because it gives me (and anybody who is interested in finding out more about what I do, including university administrators, fellow academics and potential graduate students) a clear map of how my thinking has evolved throughout the years. How I began some projects and how I’m closing others out.

Parque El Cedazo (Aguascalientes)

I can clearly tell you that I just recently realized in 2013 how I came about starting to study water conflicts. In 1998 (a decade ago), I began trying to understand how strategic alliances between large pharmaceutical companies and small biotechnology firms could be designed so that the small biotech businesses did not suffer from moral hazard conditions. I found that they cooperated through repeated games of information sharing in an information-asymmetric environment. For this project, I created a game-theoretic model that explained the entire process. It was fascinating. More than 15 years ago I fell in love with the idea of cooperation between actors, and that is one that to this day, still drives and fuels my research interests. Why do agents cooperate and under which conditions?

In 2004, I began (on a side project) studying cooperation for wastewater governance through river basin councils, almost a decade ago. Given that I had been a specialist in cooperation within industrial districts (and that was what I was doing for my PhD dissertation work), studying cooperation in water management seemed to be naturally dovetailing my work. Given that I was interested in understanding how firms within an industrial district cooperated for survival, analyzing how individuals cooperated to manage the wastewater generated within their region seemed like a plausible detour from my original scholarly trajectory. While I wasn’t bent on any particular theory, I quickly discovered Ostrom, North and Williamson’s institutional theories fit well with my interest in collaboration for water management.

Two years ago (2011), I narrowed down the analytical core of my research agenda: I’m someone who uses questions of how can agents cooperate for appropriate resource management under complex governance conditions. I am interested in intractable, wicked problems. It was important for me to see this.

Recent book acquisitions April & May 2013 CIDE Region Centro library

Last year (2012), as I was asked to write a book chapter on water conflict, I realized that I knew very little about the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and conflict resolution literatures. I also knew very little about water conflict. Much of the literature (the vast majority, in fact) I had read dealt with resource self-governance processes (a la Ostrom and collaborators). Very little had I read about “conflict transformation” and “conflict framing” (a la Barbara Gray).

Strangely enough, when I did my PhD, I took courses on multistakeholder, participatory processes for water governance (with UBC Professor Tony Dorcey). I did know about this literature, but my keen interest in cooperation quickly made me forget about it. I had read Barbara Gray, Judith Innes, Fisher and Ury and a number of planning theorists on how to get collaboration (“getting to yes”) in resource planning contexts, but in the past decade, I forgot about them. I’m just now getting back into this literature.

I am really excited for my next 5 years (2013-2018) research trajectory. I’m excited about learning more about water conflicts (and working on water conflict in Mexico at the sub-national scale). I’m fascinated by the chasm between water cooperation and water conflict bodies of work. And I’m delighted to be delving more into the solid waste governance field (one that I always wanted to explore more, but I didn’t explore in enough detail).

Posted in academia, research, water governance.

Tagged with , , .


Happy Teachers and Professors Day (May 15th) – Feliz Dia del Maestro!

Raul speaking at Social Media Camp Victoria 2011 Awards (Photo by Shelley Lipke Photography)

Photo credit: Shelley Lipke Photography on Flickr

May 15th is the day when we celebrate teachers, educators and professors in Mexico (Dia del Maestro, in Spanish). I love teaching. Actually, I feel that I was born to teach. In fact, I was born to two educators (my Mom is a professor of government and political science at the Universidad de Guanajuato, and my Dad is a lawyer who taught law for decades). My brothers (all of the four of them) have all taught high school or post-secondary in one way or another. One of them, my oldest brother (Arturo) did his PhD at the University of Notre Dame, and is now a tenured Associate Professor at California State University Los Angeles. Rafael got his PhD from, and then taught at Arizona State University. We all did our graduate degrees abroad, and even though only my Mom, Arturo and I officially remain in the higher education field, we all have taught at some point in our lives.

There are few things that give me more pleasure in life than receiving emails from former students of mine, asking for a letter of reference for graduate school or for a job, or simply asking for advice or help to navigate a complex job landscape. I can’t say that all my student reviews have always been glowing, but I have always been extremely dedicated to my students, and I love being able to shape their lives and help them grow. I recently blogged about this aspect, in fact.

Social Media Club, Victoria

Photo credit: Paul Holmes on Flickr

This is my teaching philosophy, extracted from my teaching dossier:

As a teacher, my philosophy is that learning should be constructive, challenging, fun and exciting. Constructive in that my role is to help the student feel confident about his/her skills for the future. Challenging, insofar it should present difficulties that both the student and I will have to work together to overcome. Fun, in that it should provide joy for the student and me as the teacher. And exciting in that learning should be an activity to which both student and teacher should be looking forward. The feedback I have received from students is that I am able to provide all of these in a comfortable learning environment.

I loved teaching at UBC’s Department of Political Science, I loved teaching in Mexico and have enjoyed giving lectures abroad, and I would never change my professional activity. And I love being a professor at CIDE now, and look forward to teaching this fall. Ever since I was a child, I have loved sharing whatever knowledge I have. It’s in my blood.

Of course, who doesn’t love when they get glowing reviews? I do, and comments like these keep me coming back for more. I have usually had very heavy teaching loads (2-1-2), but I never have lamented it, because I now have an army of hundreds of former students who, I believe, will change Canadian society (I have taught most of my post-PhD time in Canada, even though now I’m based in Mexico) and the world (I also have had hundreds of foreign students).

“I found Dr. Pacheco-Vega to be not only a very effective teacher but a considerate and fair individual. He made a point of including students who may have been to shy to enter discussions in class with individual discussions, asking leading questions and using blogs. He showed concern for his students learning and their well-being. I would recommend Dr. Pacheco-Vega as one of the best instructors I have had in my years at this university.”

“Raul Pacheco-Vega is indeed contributing on the paradigm shift level with his teaching. What an amazing professor/scholar/person (perhaps not constructive in an evaluation-sense, but must be said -not being perceived as strategically flatter)”

“Professor Pacheco-Vega was a rare treat to have this term and I’m glad that on my one visiting semester I had the privilege of being in one of his classes. The quality of instruction was excellent and he had the right amount of interesting guests come and speak to the class.”

“One of the best courses I have taken in my undergraduate career simply because of the class atmosphere. Dr. Pacheco-Vega acts as a mentor to his students and his classroom really is a place that is comfortable for students to share their opinions and mull out ideas they’re not sure of yet. This class was very diffuse of the normal teacher-student power relationship… rather, this class was one where all students were combining their knowledge, opinions and experience to really hash out what we were learning about.”

Raul Pachego Vega  - Northern Voice 2011

Photo credit: Kris Krug on Flickr

To my former teachers and professors, especially those who shaped my thinking (my PhD advisor, my committee members, the professors I was a research assistant of, and those I’ve coauthored papers with): you instilled passion and commitment in my research and shaped my teaching and for that, I am incredibly grateful.

To my former students: you all make me proud every day, and you remind me day after day that I made the right decision to become a professor. Your infectious energy, your intelligence, your passion to seek social change has made my teaching career incredibly rich, and I’m proud and honored to have taught you.

To my current and former colleagues: I’m humbled and thrilled to be part of the academic community at large, and of having shared scholarly pursuits with you all. You are part of what will drive change in this world, and I’m honored to be part of the academic community we belong to.

I love the collegiality of being a professor (here is a photo of me with my dear friend Professor Janni Aragon of the University of Victoria).

Social Media Camp Victoria 2011 (Amber Naslund and my talk with Janni Aragon"

So, to all of you my fellow educators, Happy Teachers, Educators and Professors Day! Feliz Dia del Maestro!

Posted in academia, teaching.

Tagged with .