<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bridging academia and media (Circle of Blue &#124; Water News)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/07/bridging-academia-and-media-circle-of-blue-water-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/07/bridging-academia-and-media-circle-of-blue-water-news/</link>
	<description>Environmental research, teaching &#38; consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/07/bridging-academia-and-media-circle-of-blue-water-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raulpacheco.org/?p=165#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting balance.  It&#039;s been my experience that academics often tend to keep things behind closed doors until they&#039;re on the verge of publication.  It avoids embarrassment should something not work out, it keeps expectations in check and it maintains the element of surprise in their field.

Do you think new media, blogging in particular, has helped change this?  Or do you think there&#039;s some persecution against less established academics (or, say, Masters or PhDs in industry) who use these tools from the ivory tower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting balance.  It&#8217;s been my experience that academics often tend to keep things behind closed doors until they&#8217;re on the verge of publication.  It avoids embarrassment should something not work out, it keeps expectations in check and it maintains the element of surprise in their field.</p>
<p>Do you think new media, blogging in particular, has helped change this?  Or do you think there&#8217;s some persecution against less established academics (or, say, Masters or PhDs in industry) who use these tools from the ivory tower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

