Comments on: Examining the Use of Citizen Submissions on Enforcement Matters (CSEM) to the North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation (NACEC) by Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/05/examining-the-use-of-citizen-submissions-on-enforcement-matters-csem-to-the-north-american-commission-on-environmental-cooperation-nacec-by-environmental-non-governmental-organizations/ Environmental research, teaching & consulting Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:41:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Being an activist and a scholar - Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/05/examining-the-use-of-citizen-submissions-on-enforcement-matters-csem-to-the-north-american-commission-on-environmental-cooperation-nacec-by-environmental-non-governmental-organizations/comment-page-1/#comment-597 Being an activist and a scholar - Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:54:58 +0000 http://www.raulpacheco.org/?p=107#comment-597 [...] find myself in a similar conundrum rather frequently, particularly when it comes to studying environmental non-governmental organizations’ strategies to mobilize and put pressure on national and supra-national [...] [...] find myself in a similar conundrum rather frequently, particularly when it comes to studying environmental non-governmental organizations’ strategies to mobilize and put pressure on national and supra-national [...]

]]> By: Christopher Parsons http://www.raulpacheco.org/2009/05/examining-the-use-of-citizen-submissions-on-enforcement-matters-csem-to-the-north-american-commission-on-environmental-cooperation-nacec-by-environmental-non-governmental-organizations/comment-page-1/#comment-85 Christopher Parsons Wed, 06 May 2009 04:29:48 +0000 http://www.raulpacheco.org/?p=107#comment-85 Again, I think that you need to lead with section #3 - get direct, right away. Sections #1 and #2 have too much detail for the abstract (I think) - I would be a little more forthcoming that this is a development stage of a project, and integrate bits and pieces of sections #1 and #2 into (currently) #3 and #4 as needed to maintain cohesion. This sounds something that is interesting, and could provide insight into other advocacy work. I'm especially interested in the 'race to the bottom', and would (for my own work) be curious to see how your work would parallel that discussion in privacy regime literature. <abbr><em>Christopher Parsons’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.christopher-parsons.com/blog/privacy/privacy-dignity-copyright-and-twitter/" rel="nofollow">Privacy, Dignity, Copyright and Twitter</a></abbr></em> Again, I think that you need to lead with section #3 – get direct, right away. Sections #1 and #2 have too much detail for the abstract (I think) – I would be a little more forthcoming that this is a development stage of a project, and integrate bits and pieces of sections #1 and #2 into (currently) #3 and #4 as needed to maintain cohesion.

This sounds something that is interesting, and could provide insight into other advocacy work. I’m especially interested in the ‘race to the bottom’, and would (for my own work) be curious to see how your work would parallel that discussion in privacy regime literature.

Christopher Parsons’s last blog post..Privacy, Dignity, Copyright and Twitter

]]>